I. I. Tupitsyn

5.5k total citations
210 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

I. I. Tupitsyn is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, I. I. Tupitsyn has authored 210 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 190 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 76 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 28 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in I. I. Tupitsyn's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (160 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (116 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (74 papers). I. I. Tupitsyn is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (160 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (116 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (74 papers). I. I. Tupitsyn collaborates with scholars based in Russia, Germany and United States. I. I. Tupitsyn's co-authors include В. М. Шабаев, G. Plunien, V. A. Yerokhin, D. A. Glazov, A. V. Volotka, M. G. Kozlov, S. G. Porsev, Y. S. Kozhedub, G. Soff and J. R. Crespo López-Urrutia and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

I. I. Tupitsyn

198 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I. I. Tupitsyn Russia 33 3.4k 1.6k 417 380 295 210 3.9k
G. W. F. Drake Canada 37 3.9k 1.1× 1.4k 0.9× 591 1.4× 375 1.0× 279 0.9× 124 4.5k
S. A. Blundell France 32 3.5k 1.0× 1.2k 0.7× 396 0.9× 267 0.7× 299 1.0× 96 3.9k
V. A. Yerokhin Russia 43 4.9k 1.4× 2.1k 1.3× 565 1.4× 936 2.5× 384 1.3× 209 5.4k
K. T. Cheng United States 38 3.9k 1.1× 871 0.5× 810 1.9× 754 2.0× 594 2.0× 93 4.1k
A. Surzhykov Germany 32 3.0k 0.9× 952 0.6× 373 0.9× 1.1k 3.0× 465 1.6× 244 3.6k
C. Kozhuharov Germany 30 2.6k 0.8× 1.9k 1.2× 415 1.0× 1.3k 3.5× 479 1.6× 205 3.7k
W. R. Johnson United States 37 4.5k 1.3× 1.1k 0.7× 771 1.8× 685 1.8× 658 2.2× 104 5.3k
S. G. Porsev Russia 40 3.9k 1.1× 747 0.5× 234 0.6× 234 0.6× 81 0.3× 116 4.2k
F. Bosch Germany 27 2.1k 0.6× 1.4k 0.8× 349 0.8× 869 2.3× 381 1.3× 132 2.8k
Manuel Vogel Germany 23 1.3k 0.4× 421 0.3× 401 1.0× 153 0.4× 148 0.5× 182 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by I. I. Tupitsyn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. I. Tupitsyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. I. Tupitsyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. I. Tupitsyn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. I. Tupitsyn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. I. Tupitsyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. I. Tupitsyn. The network helps show where I. I. Tupitsyn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. I. Tupitsyn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. I. Tupitsyn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. I. Tupitsyn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. I. Tupitsyn. I. I. Tupitsyn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Telnov, Dmitry A., et al.. (2025). Effect of electron–electron interaction on pair production in supercritical collisions of highly charged ions*. Chinese Physics C. 49(9). 94105–94105.
3.
Telnov, Dmitry A., et al.. (2025). Three-dimensional calculations of positron creation in supercritical collisions of heavy nuclei. Physical review. D. 111(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Tupitsyn, I. I., et al.. (2024). Orbital collapse and dual states of the 5g electrons in superheavy elements. Physical review. A. 109(4). 1 indexed citations
6.
Telnov, Dmitry A., et al.. (2024). Angular and energy distributions of positrons created in subcritical and supercritical slow collisions of heavy nuclei. Physical review. D. 109(3). 4 indexed citations
7.
Kozhedub, Y. S., et al.. (2023). Ground state of superheavy elements with 120Z170: Systematic study of the electron-correlation, Breit, and QED effects. Physical review. A. 107(4). 9 indexed citations
8.
Eliav, Ephraim, Y. S. Kozhedub, A. V. Malyshev, et al.. (2022). Ionization potentials and electron affinities of Rg, Cn, Nh, and Fl superheavy elements. Physical review. A. 105(6). 12 indexed citations
9.
Kozhedub, Y. S., et al.. (2022). Multiple-ionization energy difference of Ho163 and Dy163 atoms. Physical review. A. 105(1). 2 indexed citations
10.
Malyshev, A. V., et al.. (2021). Ab initio Calculations of Energy Levels in Be-Like Xenon: Strong Interference between Electron-Correlation and QED Effects. Physical Review Letters. 126(18). 183001–183001. 14 indexed citations
11.
Skripnikov, L. V., I. I. Tupitsyn, Ephraim Eliav, et al.. (2021). Electron affinity of oganesson. Physical review. A. 104(1). 18 indexed citations
12.
Safronova, M. S., et al.. (2020). Accurate Prediction of Clock Transitions in a Highly Charged Ion with Complex Electronic Structure. Physical Review Letters. 124(16). 163001–163001. 29 indexed citations
13.
Usachov, Dmitry Yu., А. В. Тарасов, Susanne Schulz, et al.. (2020). Photoelectron diffraction for probing valency and magnetism of 4f-based materials: A view on valence-fluctuating EuIr2Si2. Physical review. B.. 102(20). 14 indexed citations
14.
Шабаев, В. М., et al.. (2020). QED corrections to the P1/22P3/22 fine structure in fluorinelike ions: Model Lamb-shift-operator approach. Physical review. A. 101(5). 17 indexed citations
15.
Tupitsyn, I. I., et al.. (2014). Calculation of the X-Ray emission K and L 2,3 bands of metallic magnesium and aluminum with allowance for multielectron effects. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 118(1). 11–17. 2 indexed citations
16.
Glazov, D. A., I. I. Tupitsyn, & В. М. Шабаев. (2004). Relativistic and QED corrections to the g factor of Li-like ions (9 pages). Physical Review A. 70(6). 62104. 1 indexed citations
17.
Tupitsyn, I. I., et al.. (2004). Spin polarization and angular distribution of Auger electrons formed as a result of decay of the 3d−15p state in the Kr atom. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 99(6). 1119–1123. 3 indexed citations
18.
Кузнецов, В. Г., et al.. (1999). Multiconfiguration calculations of the electron structure of Ag 2 and Ag 2 + with the aid of the effective core potential. II. Spectroscopic constants and low-lying electronic states. Optics and Spectroscopy. 87(6). 877–887. 2 indexed citations
19.
Kotochigova, Svetlana & I. I. Tupitsyn. (1986). The Hartree-Fock-Dirac method with allowance for the superposition of configurations for calculating the oscillator strengths of transitions in heavy atoms. Optics and Spectroscopy. 61(6). 726–729.
20.
Kotochigova, Svetlana, В. Г. Кузнецов, & I. I. Tupitsyn. (1984). Hartree-Fock-Dirac calculation of the energy structures of europium and ytterbium atoms and interpretation of their optical spectra in the ultraviolet. Optics and Spectroscopy. 57(2). 113–115. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026