G. H. Bower

1.0k citations
10 papers · 654 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

G. H. Bower

9 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

G. H. Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 233
  • General Decision Sciences 24
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 147
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • Applied Psychology 45
Replace Georgia Nigro with:
Georgia Nigro United States
Bruce M. Ross United States
Ward M. Winton United States
Rainer Westermann Germany
Ulrich von Hecker United Kingdom
David H. Dodd United States
José Santacreu Spain
Deborah O. Day United States
John R. Schuck United States
Jacqueline E. Pickrell United States
G. H. Bower relative to Georgia Nigro United States Georgia Nigro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Georgia Nigro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. H. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. H. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. H. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. H. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. H. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. H. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. H. Bower. The network helps show where G. H. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside G. H. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. H. Bower Line = papers co-authored together G. H. Bower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1983379
2 199588
3 198370
4 199361
5 195931
6 195910
7 20129
8 19884
9
Category learning, judgment, and the Rescorla-Wagner model (aka the delta-rule)
19862
10 19710

About G. H. Bower

G. H. Bower is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Small Animals and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 10 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (1 paper), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (233 citations), General Decision Sciences (24 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (147 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (205 citations) and Applied Psychology (45 citations). G. H. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mike Rinck, Jerome A. Yesavage, Terry L. Rose, Milton A. Trapold, Timothy P. McNamara, Daniel Morrow, Stephen Wilson, Jia Xu, Ilan Kroo and Paul Ekman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Memory and Language, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology and ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact