Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology
2007597 citationsG. Fry, Mari Sundli Tveit et al.Urban forestry & urban greeningprofile →
Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character
2006544 citationsMari Sundli Tveit, Åsa Ode Sang et al.Landscape Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Fry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Fry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Fry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Fry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Fry. The network helps show where G. Fry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Fry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Fry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Fry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Fry. G. Fry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fry, G., et al.. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban forestry & urban greening. 6(4). 199–212.597 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Tress, Bärbel, Gunther Tress, G. Fry, & P.F.M. Opdam. (2006). From landscape research to landscape planning : aspects of integration, education and application. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).134 indexed citations
Tveit, Mari Sundli, Åsa Ode Sang, & G. Fry. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research. 31(3). 229–255.544 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Fry, G., et al.. (2005). Collecting evidence on the effects of landscape change on biodiversity.. 89–96.
11.
Tress, Bärbel, Gunther Tress, & G. Fry. (2005). Defining concepts and process of knowledge production in integrative research. (Eds.) Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P. 13–26.
12.
Fry, G., Bärbel Tress, Gunther Tress, et al.. (2004). The potential and limitations of integrated grassland research.. 1157–1167.4 indexed citations
13.
Tress, Bärbel, et al.. (2003). Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies: Potential and Limitations. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).83 indexed citations
14.
Tress, Bärbel, Gunther Tress, & G. Fry. (2003). Potential limitations of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 182–192.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.