Åsa Ode Sang

5.4k total citations · 3 hit papers
60 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Åsa Ode Sang is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Åsa Ode Sang has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 36 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Åsa Ode Sang's work include Urban Green Space and Health (48 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (33 papers) and Urban Heat Island Mitigation (9 papers). Åsa Ode Sang is often cited by papers focused on Urban Green Space and Health (48 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (33 papers) and Urban Heat Island Mitigation (9 papers). Åsa Ode Sang collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and United Kingdom. Åsa Ode Sang's co-authors include Mari Sundli Tveit, Matilda van den Bosch, G. Fry, Gary Fry, Igor Knez, Marcus Hedblom, Bengt Gunnarsson, David Miller, Caroline M.P. Hagerhall and Thomas B. Randrup and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Environmental Management and Landscape and Urban Planning.

In The Last Decade

Åsa Ode Sang

57 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

Urban natural environments as nature-b... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2017 2006 2016 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Åsa Ode Sang Sweden 28 2.6k 2.3k 739 601 527 60 3.9k
Mari Sundli Tveit Norway 17 2.1k 0.8× 1.8k 0.8× 484 0.7× 517 0.9× 351 0.7× 23 3.0k
Martin Dallimer United Kingdom 37 2.0k 0.8× 2.1k 0.9× 753 1.0× 596 1.0× 645 1.2× 129 4.6k
Thomas B. Randrup Sweden 29 2.6k 1.0× 2.0k 0.9× 1.0k 1.4× 304 0.5× 1.0k 1.9× 76 4.2k
Anna Jørgensen United Kingdom 27 2.7k 1.0× 1.5k 0.7× 662 0.9× 466 0.8× 835 1.6× 54 3.3k
Paul H. Gobster United States 29 2.6k 1.0× 2.1k 0.9× 404 0.5× 790 1.3× 619 1.2× 106 4.2k
G. Fry Norway 18 1.7k 0.7× 1.5k 0.7× 464 0.6× 456 0.8× 440 0.8× 35 3.1k
Aleksandra Kaźmierczak United Kingdom 12 2.2k 0.8× 2.2k 1.0× 1.1k 1.5× 598 1.0× 532 1.0× 25 3.6k
Danielle F. Shanahan Australia 29 3.3k 1.3× 2.0k 0.9× 654 0.9× 583 1.0× 1.0k 1.9× 53 5.2k
Geoffrey H. Donovan United States 30 1.7k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 642 0.9× 349 0.6× 462 0.9× 85 3.1k
Giovanni Sanesi Italy 39 3.6k 1.4× 3.3k 1.5× 1.5k 2.1× 620 1.0× 1.2k 2.2× 120 5.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Åsa Ode Sang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Åsa Ode Sang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Åsa Ode Sang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Åsa Ode Sang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Åsa Ode Sang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Åsa Ode Sang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Åsa Ode Sang. The network helps show where Åsa Ode Sang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Åsa Ode Sang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Åsa Ode Sang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Åsa Ode Sang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Åsa Ode Sang. Åsa Ode Sang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Jones, Laurence, Steven G. Anderson, Jeppe Læssøe, et al.. (2025). Re-Thinking People and Nature Interactions in Urban Nature-Based Solutions. Sustainability. 17(7). 3043–3043.
3.
Mårtensson, Fredrika, et al.. (2025). Creating nature-based play settings for children through looking, listening, learning and modifying in a Swedish landscape laboratory. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 7(1). 93–117. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wiström, Björn, et al.. (2024). Creative management: a framework for designing multifunctional play biotopes - lessons from a Scandinavian landscape laboratory. Urban Ecosystems. 27(5). 1599–1607. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sang, Åsa Ode, et al.. (2024). Bioaccumulation of Lead Metal (Pb) by Mangrove Plants (Rhizopora apiculata) in the Waters of Poka Village, Inner Bay of Ambon. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(1). 71–78.
7.
Sjöman, Henrik, et al.. (2024). A functional trait-based assessment of urban street tree selection for Ethiopia. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 6. 1 indexed citations
8.
Wild, Tom, Olívia Bina, Andy Inch, et al.. (2023). Supporting Nature-Based Solutions via Nature-Based Thinking across European and Latin American cities. AMBIO. 53(1). 79–94. 19 indexed citations
9.
Englund, Jan‐Eric, et al.. (2023). Shades of green for living walls – experiences of color contrast and its implication for aesthetic and psychological benefits. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 100067–100067. 11 indexed citations
10.
Randrup, Thomas B., et al.. (2021). Urban open space management in the Nordic countries. Identification of current challenges based on managers' perceptions. Cities. 115. 103225–103225. 23 indexed citations
11.
Felton, Adam, Annika M. Felton, Hilde Karine Wam, et al.. (2021). Forest biodiversity and ecosystem services from spruce-birch mixtures: The potential importance of tree spatial arrangement. Environmental Challenges. 6. 100407–100407. 18 indexed citations
12.
Butler, Andrew, et al.. (2021). “There will be mushrooms again” – Foraging, landscape and forest fire. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 33. 100358–100358. 7 indexed citations
13.
Felton, Adam, Lisa Petersson, Johanna Witzell, et al.. (2019). The tree species matters: Biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce. AMBIO. 49(5). 1035–1049. 61 indexed citations
14.
Hagerhall, Caroline M.P., et al.. (2018). Do Humans Really Prefer Semi-open Natural Landscapes? A Cross-Cultural Reappraisal. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 822–822. 43 indexed citations
15.
Bosch, Matilda van den & Åsa Ode Sang. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research. 158. 373–384. 673 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Andersson‐Sköld, Yvonne, Jenny Klingberg, Bengt Gunnarsson, et al.. (2017). A framework for assessing urban greenery's effects and valuing its ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management. 205. 274–285. 63 indexed citations
17.
Dupont, Lien, et al.. (2013). Analyzing the perception of water surfaces in urban landscapes using eye tracking. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 4 indexed citations
18.
Sang, Åsa Ode & David Miller. (2011). Analysing the Relationship between Indicators of Landscape Complexity and Preference. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design. 38(1). 24–40. 57 indexed citations
19.
Tveit, Mari Sundli, Caroline M.P. Hagerhall, Helena Nordh, & Åsa Ode Sang. (2010). Identifying Cues of Stewardship in Everyday Landscapes Using Eye Tracking. 2 indexed citations
20.
Sang, Åsa Ode, et al.. (2008). Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management. 90(1). 375–383. 308 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026