G. D. Braithwaite
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 0.5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Environmental Chemistry top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- R. F. GlascockT. W. GoodwinM.S. DhanoaP. E. BrumbyJ. E. StorryRosemary J. FulfordJ. A. BinesJ.P. Barlet
- Topics
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (16 papers)Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (13 papers)Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- SlovakiaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
G. D. Braithwaite
37 papers receiving 909 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Agronomy and Crop Science 766
- Genetics 359
- Animal Science and Zoology 225
- Environmental Chemistry 160
- Molecular Biology 118
Countries citing papers authored by G. D. Braithwaite
This map shows the geographic impact of G. D. Braithwaite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. D. Braithwaite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. D. Braithwaite more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. D. Braithwaite
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. D. Braithwaite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. D. Braithwaite. The network helps show where G. D. Braithwaite may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. D. Braithwaite
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. D. Braithwaite. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. D. Braithwaite based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. D. Braithwaite. G. D. Braithwaite is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A reappraisal of the calcium and phosphorus requirements of sheep and cattle | 45 |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 76 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 68 |
About G. D. Braithwaite
G. D. Braithwaite is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Nephrology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (16 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (13 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (766 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (225 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (160 citations). G. D. Braithwaite has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. F. Glascock, T. W. Goodwin, M.S. Dhanoa, P. E. Brumby, J. E. Storry, Rosemary J. Fulford, J. A. Bines, J.P. Barlet, D. Vital Durand and N. F. Suttle. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, British Journal Of Nutrition and The Journal of Agricultural Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.