Fulvia Skof
About
In The Last Decade
Fulvia Skof
5 papers receiving 321 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Applied Mathematics 372
- Mathematical Physics 129
- Algebra and Number Theory 72
- Geometry and Topology 49
- Numerical Analysis 45
Countries citing papers authored by Fulvia Skof
This map shows the geographic impact of Fulvia Skof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fulvia Skof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fulvia Skof more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fulvia Skof
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fulvia Skof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fulvia Skof. The network helps show where Fulvia Skof may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fulvia Skof
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fulvia Skof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fulvia Skof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fulvia Skof. Fulvia Skof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Proprieta’ locali e approssimazione di operatori breakdown → | 370 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.