Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Lecanemab, Aducanumab, and Gantenerumab — Binding Profiles to Different Forms of Amyloid-Beta Might Explain Efficacy and Side Effects in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease
2022270 citationsLinda Söderberg, Malin Johannesson et al.Neurotherapeuticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Fredrik Eriksson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Fredrik Eriksson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredrik Eriksson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredrik Eriksson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fredrik Eriksson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredrik Eriksson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredrik Eriksson. The network helps show where Fredrik Eriksson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fredrik Eriksson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fredrik Eriksson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fredrik Eriksson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fredrik Eriksson. Fredrik Eriksson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Söderberg, Linda, Malin Johannesson, Patrik Nygren, et al.. (2022). Lecanemab, Aducanumab, and Gantenerumab — Binding Profiles to Different Forms of Amyloid-Beta Might Explain Efficacy and Side Effects in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease. Neurotherapeutics. 20(1). 195–206.270 indexed citations breakdown →
Eriksson, Fredrik. (2016). Organisation, kooperation och jordbruk : Agrara organisationer och politiken omkring mitten av 1900-talet. 92–108.1 indexed citations
Eriksson, Fredrik. (2015). "Gammal" militärhistoria om andra världskriget i Baltikum : Recension av Prit Buttar, Between Giants: The Battle for the Baltics in World War II. 2014(2). 23–25.
Eriksson, Fredrik. (2013). Agriculture and Forestry in Sweden since 1900 : A Cartographic Description. Agricultural History. 87(1). 128–130.8 indexed citations
10.
Eriksson, Fredrik, et al.. (2013). Commemorating the Fallen for Friendship and Encouragement : The Commemoration of Fallen Soldiers in the Military Culture in the Baltic Sea Region 1919-1939. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 15(1). 123–143.
11.
Eriksson, Fredrik, et al.. (2009). The problematic freedom of information principle : the Swedish experience.5 indexed citations
12.
Eriksson, Fredrik. (2006). Bönder i svensk politik under 1900-talet : Exemplet den svenska högern. 126(4). 767–790.1 indexed citations
13.
Eriksson, Fredrik. (2004). Det reglerade undantaget : högerns jordbrukspolitik 1904-2004.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.