Fredric Solomon

17 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Fredric Solomon
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 77
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 64
  • Clinical Psychology 48
Replace Benjamin H. Newberry with:
Benjamin H. Newberry United States
A. Michael Rossi United States
John M. Shlien United States
Elizabeth A. Meier United States
Daniel Cappon Canada
Chris A Roe United Kingdom
Sebastiano Santostefano United States
Edward Podolsky United States
James E. Gilliam United States
William Goldfarb United States
Fredric Solomon relative to Benjamin H. Newberry United States Benjamin H. Newberry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Benjamin H. Newberry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fredric Solomon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fredric Solomon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredric Solomon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredric Solomon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fredric Solomon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredric Solomon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredric Solomon. The network helps show where Fredric Solomon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fredric Solomon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fredric Solomon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fredric Solomon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fredric Solomon. Fredric Solomon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 2
4 3
5 66
6
Monkeys' Responses to Separation and Loss
4
7
Toward a Biology of Grieving
2
8
Bereavement During Childhood and Adolescence
25
9
Bereavement Intervention Programs
3
10
Adults' Reactions to Bereavement
0
11
Epidemiologic Perspectives on the Health Consequences of Bereavement
4
12
Roles of Health Professionals and Institutions
1
13 1
14 112
15 17
16 16
17 11
18 42
19 6
20 20

About Fredric Solomon

Fredric Solomon is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Ecological Modeling, having authored 20 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (8 citations), Sensory Systems (31 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations). Fredric Solomon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J.N. Blau, Delores L. Parron, Wallace B. Mendelson, Morris Green, Marian Osterweis, Christian Gillin, Michel Hamelin, McHardy M. Smith and Bruce Michael. Their work appears in journals such as Science, New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026