Benjamin H. Newberry

19 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Benjamin H. Newberry
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Social Psychology 92
  • Clinical Psychology 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 37
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 35
Replace Joel Goldberg with:
Joel Goldberg Israel
N E Alessi United States
Chiemi Kan Japan
Matthew L. Hughes United States
Zdeňa Op de Macks United States
Vanessa Meyer United States
Kenneth L. Artiss United States
Virgínia de Oliveira Rosa Brazil
Emily Garrett United Kingdom
Nicole Phillips Australia
Benjamin H. Newberry relative to Joel Goldberg Israel Joel Goldberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Joel Goldberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin H. Newberry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin H. Newberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin H. Newberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin H. Newberry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin H. Newberry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin H. Newberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin H. Newberry. The network helps show where Benjamin H. Newberry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin H. Newberry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin H. Newberry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin H. Newberry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin H. Newberry. Benjamin H. Newberry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 24
2 32
3 7
4 9
5 1
6
The comparison of two basic approaches of cross-cultural assessment of Strelau's temperament dimensions in eight countries
1
7
The Pavlovian temperament survey (PTS) : an international handbook
51
8 14
9
A holistic conceptualization of stress and disease
10
10 1
11
Impact of psychoendocrine systems in cancer and immunity
28
12
Stress and cancer
15
13 37
14 1
15 8
16 2
17 24
18 23
19 19
20 5

About Benjamin H. Newberry

Benjamin H. Newberry is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations), Biological Psychiatry (14 citations) and Applied Psychology (26 citations). Benjamin H. Newberry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jan Strelau, Alois Angleitner, Bernard H. Fox, Julie K. Cremeans‐Smith, Gregory J. Omlor, Beth G. Wildman, Patricia Ann Beatty, Ronald L. Crawford, Andrzej Eliasz and William R. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026