Frederick Strieder

14 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Frederick Strieder
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Public Administration 50
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
  • Clinical Psychology 173
  • Safety Research 68
  • General Health Professions 116
Replace James T. Decker with:
James T. Decker United States
Youjung Lee United States
Robert F. Rivas United States
Patricia L. Ewalt United States
Lisa Klein
Elaine Norman United States
Ronald H. Rooney United States
Brianne H. Kothari United States
Marshall Fine Canada
Bodil H. Blix Norway
Frederick Strieder relative to James T. Decker United States James T. Decker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
James T. Decker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Strieder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Strieder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Strieder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Strieder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Strieder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Strieder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Strieder. The network helps show where Frederick Strieder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Strieder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Strieder Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Strieder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201910
2 201831
3 201714
4 20171
5 201610
6 20154
7 201519
8 20156
9 201438
10 201213
11 2011140
12
Replication of Family Connections: Lessons Learned from Grandparents
20091
13 19965
14 199120

About Frederick Strieder

Frederick Strieder is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Public Administration, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Demography, having authored 14 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (50 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations), Clinical Psychology (173 citations), Safety Research (68 citations) and General Health Professions (116 citations). Frederick Strieder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Barth, Kathryn S. Collins, Michael A. Lindsey, Kimberly D. Becker, Bethany R. Lee, Bruce F. Chorpita, Jacqueline A. Sparks, Julián Montoro‐Rodríguez, Gregory C. Smith and Bert Hayslip. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Social Work Practice, Journal of Child and Family Studies, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Journal of Family Psychology and Journal of Public Child Welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026