Frederick S. Lane
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Dennis R. YoungMichael O’NeillDiane Vinokur‐KaplanPeter Dobkin HallHarold OrlansJoseph A. Weber
- Topics
- Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers)Digital Games and Media (2 papers)Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers)
- Journals
- Public Administration ReviewThe Journal of Higher EducationNonprofit Management and Leadership
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Frederick S. Lane
17 papers receiving 211 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Sociology and Political Science 108
- Public Administration 64
- Clinical Psychology 63
- Gender Studies 63
- Political Science and International Relations 40
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick S. Lane
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick S. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick S. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick S. Lane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick S. Lane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick S. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick S. Lane. The network helps show where Frederick S. Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick S. Lane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick S. Lane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick S. Lane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick S. Lane. Frederick S. Lane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Cybertraps for the Young | 2 |
| 3 | American Privacy: The 400-Year History of Our Most Contested Right | 9 |
| 4 | The Court and the Cross: The Religious Right's Crusade to Reshape the Supreme Court | 0 |
| 5 | The Decency Wars: The Campaign to Cleanse American Culture | 6 |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Obscene Profits: The Entrepreneurs of Pornography in the Cyber Age | 73 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | Higher Education in New York. | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Current Issues in Public Administration | 115 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About Frederick S. Lane
Frederick S. Lane is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 18 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (64 citations), Gender Studies (63 citations) and Clinical Psychology (63 citations). Frederick S. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dennis R. Young, Michael O’Neill, Diane Vinokur‐Kaplan, Peter Dobkin Hall, Michael O’Neill, Harold Orlans and Joseph A. Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, The Journal of Higher Education and Nonprofit Management and Leadership.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.