Frederick R. Karl
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy
- Cultural Studies
- Co-authors
- Marc RobinsonMarvin J. LaHoodM.P. ThompsonStanley WeintraubDaniel Joseph SingalJoseph ConradClaude RawsonHarry T. Moore
- Topics
- Joseph Conrad and Literature (10 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (5 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick R. Karl
19 papers receiving 48 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 83
- History 19
- Sociology and Political Science 18
- Philosophy 14
- Cultural Studies 8
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick R. Karl
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick R. Karl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick R. Karl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick R. Karl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick R. Karl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick R. Karl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick R. Karl. The network helps show where Frederick R. Karl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick R. Karl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick R. Karl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick R. Karl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick R. Karl. Frederick R. Karl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Fictions: 1980-2000: Whose America Is It Anyway? | 4 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | George Eliot, voice of a century : a biography | 6 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | The Signet classic book of British short stories | 1 |
| 7 | Joseph Conrad, the three lives : a biography | 12 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | The adversary literature : the English novel in the eighteenth century: a study in genre | 1 |
| 10 | A reader's guide to the eighteenth-century English Novel | 2 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | An age of fiction : the nineteenth century British novel | 0 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | A Reader's Guide to Great Twentieth-Century English Novels | 1 |
| 16 | Joseph Conrad's Literary Theory | 0 |
| 17 | Joseph Conrad: The Three Lives | 33 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Frederick R. Karl
Frederick R. Karl is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy, having authored 37 papers that have together received 132 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Joseph Conrad and Literature (10 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (5 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (83 citations), History (19 citations) and Philosophy (14 citations). Frederick R. Karl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc Robinson, Marvin J. LaHood, M.P. Thompson, Stanley Weintraub, Daniel Joseph Singal, Joseph Conrad, Claude Rawson and Harry T. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The Modern Language Review and Comparative Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.