Frederick Pfister
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Neurology top 5%
- Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 8
-
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies 4
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes 1
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Peter Hammes (19 shared papers)Yu-Xi Feng (13 shared papers)Michael Brownlee (1 shared paper)Franziska vom Hagen (8 shared papers)Alexander Marx (3 shared papers)Sigrid Hoffmann (6 shared papers)Urban Deutsch (6 shared papers)Philipp Ströbel (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry (5 papers)Diabetes (3 papers)Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2 papers)Diabetologia (2 papers)Histopathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Frederick Pfister
43 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Ophthalmology 430
- Neurology 270
- Neurology 69
- Nephrology 104
- Clinical Biochemistry 29
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Pfister
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Pfister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Pfister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Pfister more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Pfister
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Pfister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Pfister. The network helps show where Frederick Pfister may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Pfister, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 307 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 280 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 213 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 101 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 94 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 93 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 25 |
About Frederick Pfister
Frederick Pfister is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Nephrology, Hematology, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (4 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (2 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (1 paper) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (430 citations), Neurology (270 citations), Neurology (69 citations), Nephrology (104 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (29 citations). Frederick Pfister has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Peter Hammes, Yu-Xi Feng, Michael Brownlee, Franziska vom Hagen, Alexander Marx, Sigrid Hoffmann, Urban Deutsch, Philipp Ströbel, Berthold C. G. Schalke and Arthur Melms. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, Diabetes, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Diabetologia and Histopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.