Frederick L. Tyson
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Genetics
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- April OhJames GoodwinTimothy R. RebbeckRonald P. AbelesRobert A. HiattJon KernerKatherine L. TuckerElectra D. Paskett
- Topics
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (9 papers)Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers)Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandNorway
In The Last Decade
Frederick L. Tyson
19 papers receiving 855 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Molecular Biology 322
- Oncology 188
- General Health Professions 158
- Genetics 120
- Health 86
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Tyson
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Tyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Tyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Tyson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Tyson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Tyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Tyson. The network helps show where Frederick L. Tyson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick L. Tyson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick L. Tyson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick L. Tyson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick L. Tyson. Frederick L. Tyson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 210 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Environmental Epigenomics in Health and Disease Epigenetics and Disease Origins | 3 |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | Approaching Health Disparities From a Population Perspective: The National Institutes of Health Centers for Population Health and Health Disparitiesbreakdown → | 410 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Specific chromosomal aberrations in mouse lung adenocarcinoma cell lines detected by spectral karyotyping: a comparison with human lung adenocarcinoma. | 19 |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Frederick L. Tyson
Frederick L. Tyson is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (9 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (86 citations), Oncology (188 citations) and General Health Professions (158 citations). Frederick L. Tyson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Norway. Frequent co-authors include April Oh, James Goodwin, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Ronald P. Abeles, Robert A. Hiatt, Jon Kerner, Katherine L. Tucker, Electra D. Paskett, Nicole Lurie and Shobha Srinivasan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cancer and American Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.