Frederick J. Boland

482 citations
17 papers · 387 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick J. Boland

17 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Frederick J. Boland
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Clinical Psychology 227
  • Applied Psychology 49
  • Pharmacy 26
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
  • Sensory Systems 17
Replace Edward E. Abramson with:
Edward E. Abramson United States
Fred J. Boland Canada
Rachel Lawson New Zealand
Erik M. Benau United States
Esther Jansen Netherlands
Leslie Solyom Canada
Susan E. Barker United States
Sarah Hollitt Australia
Howard Brewer Canada
James R. Falk United States
Frederick J. Boland relative to Edward E. Abramson United States Edward E. Abramson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Edward E. Abramson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. Boland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. Boland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. Boland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. Boland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. Boland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. Boland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. Boland. The network helps show where Frederick J. Boland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Frederick J. Boland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick J. Boland Line = papers co-authored together Frederick J. Boland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198667
2 199955
3 197852
4
A comparison of male and female university athletes and nonathletes on eating disorder indices: are athletes protected?
199144
5 199038
6 198834
7 198727
8 198323
9 198714
10 19809
11 20008
12 19837
13 19884
14 19882
15 19871
16 19861
17 19991

About Frederick J. Boland

Frederick J. Boland is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (227 citations), Applied Psychology (49 citations), Pharmacy (26 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations) and Sensory Systems (17 citations). Frederick J. Boland has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Slovenia and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Howard E. Barbaree, Pierre Leichner, Sam Revusky, C. S. Mellor, J. G. Albinson, G. Cynthia Fekken, Sherry H. Stewart and J. J. Cyr. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Alcohol and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact