Sam Revusky

1.9k total citations
42 papers, 833 citations indexed

About

Sam Revusky is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Revusky has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 833 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Sam Revusky's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (20 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (16 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (16 papers). Sam Revusky is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (20 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (16 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (16 papers). Sam Revusky collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Lebanon. Sam Revusky's co-authors include Steve Reilly, Linda A. Parker, Carolyn W. Harley, Harald K. Taukulis, Richard W. Pohl, C. S. Mellor, Frederick J. Boland, Bow Tong Lett, Michael G. Zagorski and Richard Harding and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Sam Revusky

42 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sam Revusky Canada 17 429 372 184 143 87 42 833
Ralph L. Elkins United States 18 369 0.9× 302 0.8× 253 1.4× 242 1.7× 102 1.2× 48 938
Stephen B. Klein United States 14 380 0.9× 594 1.6× 156 0.8× 101 0.7× 68 0.8× 38 959
David L. Wolgin United States 16 471 1.1× 176 0.5× 43 0.2× 84 0.6× 80 0.9× 50 760
H. Moore Arnold United States 16 331 0.8× 306 0.8× 61 0.3× 69 0.5× 170 2.0× 37 767
Harald K. Taukulis Canada 14 241 0.6× 181 0.5× 79 0.4× 45 0.3× 59 0.7× 21 454
G.D. D'Mello United Kingdom 13 482 1.1× 137 0.4× 71 0.4× 113 0.8× 208 2.4× 23 649
Daniel R. Snyder United States 10 303 0.7× 433 1.2× 65 0.4× 34 0.2× 112 1.3× 18 799
Geoffrey D. Carr Canada 8 787 1.8× 461 1.2× 62 0.3× 52 0.4× 272 3.1× 9 1.0k
Tony Hunt Canada 10 566 1.3× 197 0.5× 117 0.6× 165 1.2× 184 2.1× 14 691
Dale M. Atrens Australia 18 472 1.1× 268 0.7× 41 0.2× 41 0.3× 153 1.8× 61 871

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Revusky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Revusky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Revusky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Revusky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Revusky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Revusky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Revusky. The network helps show where Sam Revusky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Revusky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Revusky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Revusky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Revusky. Sam Revusky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reilly, Steve, Carolyn W. Harley, & Sam Revusky. (1993). Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus enhance latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion and increase resistance to extinction in conditioned taste preference.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 107(6). 996–1004. 63 indexed citations
2.
Reilly, Steve, Carolyn W. Harley, & Sam Revusky. (1993). Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus enhance latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion and increase resistance to extinction in conditioned taste preference.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 107(6). 996–1004. 75 indexed citations
3.
Reilly, Steve & Sam Revusky. (1992). Drug-drug heart rate conditioning in rats: Effective USs when pentobarbital in the CS. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 42(4). 633–643. 8 indexed citations
4.
Revusky, Sam & Steve Reilly. (1990). Dose effects on heart rate conditioning when pentobarbital is the CS and amphetamine is the US. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 36(4). 933–936. 10 indexed citations
5.
Revusky, Sam & Steve Reilly. (1990). When pentobarbital is the conditioned stimulus and amphetamine is the unconditioned stimulus, conditioning depends on the type of conditioned response.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 104(5). 693–703. 10 indexed citations
6.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1989). Heart rate conditioning with pentobarbital as a conditioned stimulus and amphetamine as an unconditioned stimulus.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 103(2). 296–307. 15 indexed citations
7.
Revusky, Sam & Steve Reilly. (1989). Attenuation of conditioned taste aversions by external stressors. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 33(1). 219–226. 27 indexed citations
8.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1988). Glucocorticoids attenuate taste aversions produced by toxins in rats. Psychopharmacology. 96(3). 400–407. 26 indexed citations
9.
Revusky, Sam. (1985). Questions about conditioned immunosuppression and biological adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 8(3). 407–407. 20 indexed citations
10.
Parker, Linda A. & Sam Revusky. (1982). Generalized conditioned flavor aversions: Effects of toxicosis training with one flavor on the preference for different novel flavors. Animal Learning & Behavior. 10(4). 505–510. 10 indexed citations
11.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1982). Drug states as discriminative stimuli in a flavor-aversion learning experiment.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 96(2). 200–211. 36 indexed citations
12.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1981). Failure of albino guinea pigs to exhibit Lavin's poisoned partner effect. Behavioral and Neural Biology. 32(1). 111–113. 2 indexed citations
13.
Revusky, Sam. (1980). A sensory preconditioning effect after a single flavor-flavor pairing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 15(2). 83–86. 2 indexed citations
14.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1980). Flavor aversions and deprivation state. Animal Learning & Behavior. 8(4). 543–549. 10 indexed citations
15.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1980). Dependence of the Avfail effect on the sequence of training operations. Behavioral and Neural Biology. 29(4). 430–445. 14 indexed citations
16.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1979). Reacquisition of learned taste aversions. Animal Learning & Behavior. 7(3). 377–382. 11 indexed citations
17.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1979). Learned associations between drug states: Attempted analysis in Pavlovian terms. Physiological Psychology. 7(4). 352–363. 16 indexed citations
18.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1979). Chemical aversion therapy: Rat data suggest it may be countertherapeutic to pair an addictive drug state with sickness. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 17(3). 177–188. 47 indexed citations
19.
Revusky, Sam, et al.. (1976). Rat data which suggest alcoholic beverages should be swallowed during chemical aversion therapy, not just tasted. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 14(3). 189–194. 29 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Linda A. & Sam Revusky. (1975). Failure of Sprague-Dawley rats to transfer taste-aversions or preferences by odor-marking the spout. Behavioral Biology. 15(3). 383–387. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026