Frederick E. Smith
- Ecology top 1%
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 1
-
- Plant and animal studies 2
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
-
- Library Science and Administration 5
-
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
- Historical Studies of British Isles 3
-
- Web and Library Services 2
-
- Early Modern Women Writers 2
-
- Dermatological diseases and infestations 1
- Co-authors
- Nelson G. HairstonLawrence B. SlobodkinEdward R. BaylorComfort O. OkpalaFrancis C. EvansEdward D. GoldbergF. H. VerhoffR. Daubenmire
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Frederick E. Smith
22 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
- Ecology 1.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Insect Science 509
- Ecological Modeling 173
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Smith. The network helps show where Frederick E. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Frederick E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 140 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 6 | Man's impact on terrestrial and oceanic ecosystems | 1971 | 24 |
| 7 | 1971 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1967 | 185 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 235 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 3 | |
| 12 | BEES AND POLARIZED LIGHT | 1961 | 2 |
| 13 | Community Structure, Population Control, and Competitionbreakdown → | 1960 | 2482 |
| 14 | 1958 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1953 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1953 | 56 | |
| 18 | 1953 | 58 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 58 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 1 |
About Frederick E. Smith
Frederick E. Smith is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Religious studies and History, having authored 30 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Dermatological diseases and infestations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Ecology (1.6k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations). Frederick E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nelson G. Hairston, Lawrence B. Slobodkin, Edward R. Baylor, Comfort O. Okpala, Francis C. Evans, Edward D. Goldberg, F. H. Verhoff, R. Daubenmire, Forest Stearns and Katharina Lettau. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, The American Naturalist, BioScience, The English Historical Review and The Journal of Educational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.