Frederick C. Grant
Impact in
- Religious studies top 0.1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Christian Theology and Mission
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
- Theology and Canon Law Studies
- Archeology top 2%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 19
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 3
- Christian Theology and Mission 2
- Theology and Canon Law Studies 2
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 7
Frederick C. Grant
18 papers receiving 229 citations
Frederick C. Grant's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Religious studies 341
- Archeology 114
- Classics 25
- Development 22
- Sociology and Political Science 205
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick C. Grant
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick C. Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick C. Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick C. Grant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick C. Grant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick C. Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick C. Grant. The network helps show where Frederick C. Grant may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Frederick C. Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The History of the Synoptic Tradition Hit paper breakdown → | 1964 | 200 |
| 2 | Theologie des Neuen Testaments Hit paper breakdown → | 1954 | 100 |
| 3 | 1952 | 33 | |
| 4 | 1963 | 26 | |
| 5 | The influence of Greek ideas on Christianity. | 1985 | 11 |
| 6 | 1954 | 9 | |
| 7 | Ancient Roman religion | 1957 | 8 |
| 8 | 1963 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1963 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1951 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 5 | |
| 13 | Earliest Christianity : a history of the period A.D. 30-150 | 1959 | 4 |
| 14 | Translating the Bible | 1961 | 4 |
| 15 | Early Christianity: the purpose of acts and other papers | 1955 | 3 |
| 16 | Ancient Judaism and the New Testament | 1959 | 2 |
| 17 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 19 | The Early Days of Christianity | 2007 | 2 |
| 20 | Form criticism : two essays on New Testament research | 1962 | 1 |
About Frederick C. Grant
Frederick C. Grant is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Anthropology and History, having authored 26 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (19 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (3 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (341 citations), Archeology (114 citations), Classics (25 citations), Development (22 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (205 citations). Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Bultmann, John Marsh, C. F. D. Moule, Millar Burrows, G. W. H. Lampe, Peter Ackroyd, H. H. Rowley, James Hastings, C. F. Evans and Johannes Weiß. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Novum Testamentum, The Classical World, The Jewish Quarterly Review and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.