Frederic Schick

823 citations
28 papers · 394 indexed · h-index 12

Frederic Schick

25 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Frederic Schick
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • General Decision Sciences 155
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • Philosophy 102
  • Safety Research 56
  • Management Science and Operations Research 61
Replace Edward F. McClennen with:
Edward F. McClennen United States
Lawrence G. Sager United States
Alfred F. MacKay United States
Charles R. Nesson United States
Ronald J. Allen Philippines
Marc Jekel Germany
Ro’i Zultan Israel
Remco Heesen United Kingdom
Enrico Petracca Italy
Kimihiko Yamagishi Japan
Frederic Schick relative to Edward F. McClennen United States Edward F. McClennen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Edward F. McClennen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic Schick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic Schick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic Schick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic Schick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic Schick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic Schick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic Schick. The network helps show where Frederic Schick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Frederic Schick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic Schick Line = papers co-authored together Frederic Schick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20040
2 200316
3 20004
4 200039
5
Hacer elecciones: una reconstrucción de la teoría de la decisión
20004
6 19993
7 199748
8 19931
9 19920
10 198813
11 19860
12 198679
13 198420
14 19801
15 19804
16 197922
17 19727
18 197111
19 19666
20 196319

About Frederic Schick

Frederic Schick is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Economics and Econometrics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Economic theories and models (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (155 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), Philosophy (102 citations), Safety Research (56 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (61 citations). Frederic Schick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Isaac Levi, Edward J. Green, Jerrold J. Katz, Martin Hollis, Eugene Rochberg‐Halton and Richard C. Jeffrey. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Economics and Philosophy, Synthese, Theory and Decision and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026