Theory and Decision

1.8k papers and 24.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Theory and Decision in the last decades have received a total of 24.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Theory and Decision usually cover Economics and Econometrics (997 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (698 papers) and General Decision Sciences (665 papers) specifically the topics of Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (665 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (470 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (402 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theory and Decision are Charles F. Manski, Bernard Roy, Reinhard Selten, Peter C. Fishburn, Jay W. Forrester, Peter P. Wakker, John C. Harsanyi, Peter J. Hammond, Robert Sugden and Amartya Sen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theory and Decision

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory and Decision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory and Decision.

Countries where authors publish in Theory and Decision

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory and Decision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory and Decision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory and Decision more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025