Martin Hollis
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Steve SmithSteven LukesBryan S. GreenJohn HicksAlan GarfinkelAlexander RosenbergRobert SugdenEdward J. Nell
- Topics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers)International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Martin Hollis
74 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- Political Science and International Relations 851
- Economics and Econometrics 513
- Philosophy 381
- History and Philosophy of Science 262
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Hollis
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Hollis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Hollis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Hollis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Hollis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Hollis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Hollis. The network helps show where Martin Hollis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Hollis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Hollis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Hollis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Hollis. Martin Hollis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Rationalitèat Und Soziales Verstehen Wittgenstein-Vorlesungen der Universitèat Bayreuth | 2 |
| 5 | Explaining and Understanding International Relations | 354 |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 386 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | Philosophy and economic theory | 65 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Anthony Giddens, "New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies" | 1 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | MACKIE, J. L. "The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation" | 2 |
| 20 | 6 |
About Martin Hollis
Martin Hollis is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 80 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (262 citations), General Decision Sciences (72 citations) and Development (131 citations). Martin Hollis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Steve Smith, Steven Lukes, Bryan S. Green, John Hicks, Alan Garfinkel, Alexander Rosenberg, Robert Sugden, Edward J. Nell, Ernest Gellner and Frank Hahn. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Economic Journal and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.