Frederic S. Lee

2.2k citations
47 papers · 819 indexed · h-index 17

Frederic S. Lee

40 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Frederic S. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 354
  • Economics and Econometrics 556
  • Sociology and Political Science 317
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 52
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Jakob Kapeller with:
Jakob Kapeller Austria
Elise S. Brezis Israel
Christian Fons‐Rosen United States
Gustav F. Papanek United States
Paul Hare United Kingdom
George R. Feiwel United States
Erasmo Papagni Italy
Jaan Masso Estonia
Giovanna Vallanti Italy
Juin‐jen Chang Taiwan
Frederic S. Lee relative to Jakob Kapeller Austria Jakob Kapeller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Jakob Kapeller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic S. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic S. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic S. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic S. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic S. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic S. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic S. Lee. The network helps show where Frederic S. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Frederic S. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic S. Lee Line = papers co-authored together Frederic S. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20178
2 20121
3 201253
4 20110
5 20115
6 201110
7
Evaluating economic research in a contested discipline : rankings, pluralism, and the future of heterodox economics
20105
8 20101
9
Routledge advances in heterodox economics
20090
10 200816
11 20070
12
Grounded Theory and Heterodox Economics
20050
13 200448
14 200414
15 200430
16 20036
17 199853
18 199433
19 199013
20 19888

About Frederic S. Lee

Frederic S. Lee is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 47 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (27 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (20 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (13 papers), Economic theories and models (7 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (354 citations), Economics and Econometrics (556 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (317 citations). Frederic S. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Harley, Steve Keen, Warren Young, Wolfram Elsner, Bruce Cronin, Andrew B. Trigg, Éric Tymoigne, Paul Downward, Marc Lavoie and Wilfred Dolfsma. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Political Economy, Journal of Economic Issues, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Review of Radical Political Economics and Capital & Class.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026