Replace Scottish Journal of Political Economy with:
Scottish Journal of Political EconomyUnited Kingdom
Monthly ReviewUnited States
Explorations in Economic HistoryUnited States
American Journal of Economics and SociologyUnited States
Development Policy ReviewUnited Kingdom
South African Journal of EconomicsSouth Africa
International Journal of Social EconomicsUnited States
Economic RecordAustralia
European Journal of Development ResearchUnited Kingdom
Contemporary Economic PolicyUnited States
Scottish Journal of Political EconomyUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Review of Radical Political Economics
Review of Radical Political Economics · 1×
×0.75.0kSPS
×2.715.7kEE
×1.26.0kGEEF
×1.12.7kFINAN
×0.81.9kPSIR
Citations per year, relative to Review of Radical Political Economics
Review of Radical Political Economics · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Review of Radical Political Economics
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Radical Political Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Radical Political Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.