Review of Radical Political Economics

1.7k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (763 papers), Economics and Econometrics (601 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (599 papers) specifically the topics of Political Economy and Marxism (556 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (540 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (282 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Radical Political Economics are Stephen A. Marglin, David M. Kotz, Duncan K. Foley, James Crotty, Herbert Gintis, Fred Moseley, Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Jonathan P. Goldstein, Alain Lipietz and Marc Lavoie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Radical Political Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Radical Political Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Radical Political Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Radical Political Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025