Dana Boebinger
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Music top 5%
- Diverse Music Education Insights
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 8
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 6
- Neural dynamics and brain function 6
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 1
-
- Music and Audio Processing 3
- Speech and Audio Processing 2
- Blind Source Separation Techniques 1
- Co-authors
- Samuel Evans (5 shared papers)Sophie K. Scott (5 shared papers)Josh H. McDermott (6 shared papers)César F. Lima (3 shared papers)Tom Manly (1 shared paper)Stuart Rosen (1 shared paper)Nancy Kanwisher (2 shared papers)Sam Norman-Haignere (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (3 papers)Cerebral Cortex (1 paper)PLoS Biology (1 paper)Journal of Neurophysiology (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Dana Boebinger
10 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Cognitive Neuroscience 313
- Music 38
- Speech and Hearing 51
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
- Signal Processing 66
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Boebinger
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Boebinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Boebinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Boebinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Boebinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Boebinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Boebinger. The network helps show where Dana Boebinger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Boebinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 0 |
About Dana Boebinger
Dana Boebinger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Social Psychology, Music and Speech and Hearing, having authored 11 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (2 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (1 paper), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (313 citations), Music (38 citations), Speech and Hearing (51 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations) and Signal Processing (66 citations). Dana Boebinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Evans, Sophie K. Scott, Josh H. McDermott, César F. Lima, Tom Manly, Stuart Rosen, Nancy Kanwisher, Sam Norman-Haignere, Jenelle Feather and Dan Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Cerebral Cortex, PLoS Biology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.