Frederic M. Lord

165 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Hit Papers

Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores195220261976200119691983196719522.0k4.0k6.0k

Peers

Frederic M. Lord
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Management Science and Operations Research 5.8k
  • Statistics and Probability 3.5k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 2.7k
  • Education 1.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.6k
Replace Allan Birnbaum with:
Allan Birnbaum United States
Melvin R. Novick United States
William W. Rozeboom Canada
Howard Wainer United States
R. Darrell Bock United States
Ronald K. Hambleton United States
Roderick P. McDonald Australia
Fritz Drasgow United States
David Thissen United States
Robert L. Linn United States
Frederic M. Lord relative to Allan Birnbaum United States Allan Birnbaum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Allan Birnbaum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic M. Lord

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic M. Lord's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic M. Lord with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic M. Lord more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic M. Lord

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic M. Lord. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic M. Lord. The network helps show where Frederic M. Lord may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederic M. Lord

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederic M. Lord. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederic M. Lord based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederic M. Lord. Frederic M. Lord is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2 4
3 2
4 17
5 22
6 10
7
A Computer Program for Estimating Item Characteristic Curve Parameters Using Birnbaum's Three-Parameter Logistic Model
2
8 2
9 153
10 8
11 14
12 9
13 84
14
Estimating true measurements from fallible measurements (binomial case)
2
15 98
16 38
17 7
18 2
19 56
20 1

About Frederic M. Lord

Frederic M. Lord is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 175 papers that have together received 13.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (42 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (39 papers) and Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (5.8k citations), Statistics and Probability (3.5k citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.0k citations). Frederic M. Lord has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Allan Birnbaum, Melvin R. Novick, William W. Rozeboom, Martha L. Stocking, Marilyn S. Wingersky, Henry E. Garrett, M. A. Barton, J. A. Keats, Maurice M. Tatsuoka and Max A. Woodbury. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of the American Statistical Association and American Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026