Frédéric Klopp

1.6k citations
70 papers · 759 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Klopp

68 papers receiving 693 citations

Peers

Frédéric Klopp
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Mathematical Physics 700
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 378
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 270
  • Statistics and Probability 124
  • Applied Mathematics 52
Replace Günter Stolz with:
Günter Stolz United States
Peter Stollmann Germany
François Germinet France
Vojkan Jakšić Canada
Raphael H�egh-Krohn Norway
Konstantin A. Makarov United States
Hagen Neidhardt Germany
Volker Enß Germany
E. Mourre France
Ilya Goldsheid United Kingdom
Frédéric Klopp relative to Günter Stolz United States Günter Stolz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Günter Stolz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Klopp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Klopp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Klopp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Klopp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Klopp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Klopp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Klopp. The network helps show where Frédéric Klopp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Klopp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Klopp Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Klopp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199557
2 200751
3 199946
4 200243
5
200230
6 200230
7
200227
8 200226
9 201021
10 200318
11 200018
12 199916
13 199616
14 200216
15
Random Schrödinger operators
200815
16 200114
17 201214
18 199513
19 200413
20 200213

About Frédéric Klopp

Frédéric Klopp is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 70 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (63 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (32 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (20 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (16 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (11 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (700 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (378 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (270 citations), Statistics and Probability (124 citations) and Applied Mathematics (52 citations). Frédéric Klopp has collaborated with scholars based in France, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Hislop, Alexander Fedotov, Jean‐Michel Combes, Shu Nakamura, François Germinet, James Ralston, L. А. Pastur, Maciej Zworski, Thomas Wolff and Georgi Raikov. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Duke Mathematical Journal, Annales Henri Poincaré, Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry and Journal of Functional Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact