Peter Stollmann

1.8k citations
48 papers · 840 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Stollmann

47 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers

Peter Stollmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Mathematical Physics 688
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 361
  • Applied Mathematics 178
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 194
  • Statistics and Probability 110
Replace Günter Stolz with:
Günter Stolz United States
Ари Лаптев United Kingdom
Plamen Djakov United States
Leonid Friedlander United States
Steffen Rohde United States
Seppo Hassi Finland
Vladimir Rabinovich Mexico
Frédéric Hérau France
Hagen Neidhardt Germany
A A Gonchar Russia
Peter Stollmann relative to Günter Stolz United States Günter Stolz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Günter Stolz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stollmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stollmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stollmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stollmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stollmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stollmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stollmann. The network helps show where Peter Stollmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stollmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stollmann Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stollmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996132
2 2001103
3 200192
4 200147
5 199840
6 199840
7 200031
8 200530
9 202019
10 199517
11 201017
12 199914
13 200914
14 200614
15 200714
16 199212
17 199412
18 199812
19 200612
20 198511

About Peter Stollmann

Peter Stollmann is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (29 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (18 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (13 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (6 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (4 papers), Quasicrystal Structures and Properties (4 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (4 papers) and Holomorphic and Operator Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (688 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (361 citations), Applied Mathematics (178 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (194 citations) and Statistics and Probability (110 citations). Peter Stollmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include J. Voigt, Daniel Lenz, Günter Stolz, Werner Kirsch, David Damanik, Anne Boutet de Monvel, Jürgen Voigt, Pavel Exner, Serguei Naboko and Peter Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Functional Analysis, Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry, Integral Equations and Operator Theory, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Israel Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact