Frédéric Déglise

766 total citations
11 papers, 159 citations indexed

About

Frédéric Déglise is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Algebra and Number Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Frédéric Déglise has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Mathematical Physics, 11 papers in Geometry and Topology and 2 papers in Algebra and Number Theory. Recurrent topics in Frédéric Déglise's work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (11 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (10 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (9 papers). Frédéric Déglise is often cited by papers focused on Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (11 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (10 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (9 papers). Frédéric Déglise collaborates with scholars based in France, Taiwan and Russia. Frédéric Déglise's co-authors include Denis-Charles Cisinski, Mikhail V. Bondarko and Jean Fasel and has published in prestigious journals such as Advances in Mathematics, Mathematische Zeitschrift and Springer monographs in mathematics.

In The Last Decade

Frédéric Déglise

11 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Frédéric Déglise France	8	149	147	25	6	4	11	159
Ruochuan Liu United States	7	107 0.7×	110 0.7×	38 1.5×	9 1.5×	9 2.3×	14	124
L Fargues France	7	127 0.9×	119 0.8×	19 0.8×	7 1.2×	5 1.3×	11	133
Christian Haesemeyer United States	8	126 0.8×	106 0.7×	34 1.4×	6 1.0×	7 1.8×	15	132
Vadim Vologodsky United States	6	113 0.8×	99 0.7×	29 1.2×	12 2.0×	5 1.3×	11	120
Marc Hoyois United States	7	183 1.2×	178 1.2×	27 1.1×	7 1.2×	3 0.8×	15	193
Jochen Heinloth Germany	6	130 0.9×	125 0.9×	14 0.6×	9 1.5×	3 0.8×	16	135
Matthew Morrow France	5	153 1.0×	146 1.0×	48 1.9×	3 0.5×	11 2.8×	15	162
Jean Fasel France	8	169 1.1×	142 1.0×	49 2.0×	21 3.5×	3 0.8×	24	180
Urs Hartl Germany	8	110 0.7×	89 0.6×	36 1.4×	7 1.2×	11 2.8×	16	119
Holger Reich Germany	8	139 0.9×	140 1.0×	36 1.4×	19 3.2×	4 1.0×	13	156

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Déglise

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Déglise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Déglise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Déglise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Déglise

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Déglise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Déglise. The network helps show where Frédéric Déglise may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédéric Déglise

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédéric Déglise. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédéric Déglise based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frédéric Déglise. Frédéric Déglise is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Déglise, Frédéric, et al.. (2021). On the rational motivic homotopy category. arXiv (Cornell University). 8. 533–583. 1 indexed citations

2.

Déglise, Frédéric, et al.. (2021). Fundamental classes in motivic homotopy theory. Journal of the European Mathematical Society. 23(12). 3935–3993. 12 indexed citations

3.

Cisinski, Denis-Charles & Frédéric Déglise. (2019). Triangulated Categories of Mixed Motives. Springer monographs in mathematics. 55 indexed citations

4.

Déglise, Frédéric. (2018). Bivariant Theories in Motivic Stable Homotopy. Documenta Mathematica. 23. 997–1076. 8 indexed citations

5.

Bondarko, Mikhail V. & Frédéric Déglise. (2017). Dimensional homotopy t-structures in motivic homotopy theory. Advances in Mathematics. 311. 91–189. 10 indexed citations

6.

Cisinski, Denis-Charles & Frédéric Déglise. (2015). Étale motives. Compositio Mathematica. 152(3). 556–666. 30 indexed citations

7.

Déglise, Frédéric, et al.. (2014). THE RIGID SYNTOMIC RING SPECTRUM. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu. 14(4). 753–799. 7 indexed citations

8.

Cisinski, Denis-Charles & Frédéric Déglise. (2011). Mixed Weil cohomologies. Advances in Mathematics. 230(1). 55–130. 17 indexed citations

9.

Déglise, Frédéric. (2008). Motifs Génériques. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova. 119. 173–244. 9 indexed citations

10.

Déglise, Frédéric. (2005). Transferts sur les groupes de Chow à coefficients. Mathematische Zeitschrift. 252(2). 315–343. 6 indexed citations

11.

Déglise, Frédéric. (2003). Interprétation motivique de la formule d'excès d'intersection. Comptes Rendus Mathématique. 338(1). 41–46. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact