Documenta Mathematica

926 papers and 7.0k indexed citations

About

The 926 papers published in Documenta Mathematica in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Documenta Mathematica usually cover Geometry and Topology (637 papers), Mathematical Physics (616 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (312 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (358 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (294 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (224 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Documenta Mathematica are N. Christopher Phillips, Bernhard Keller, John F. Jardine, Marc A. Rieffel, Ian Agol, Markus Rost, Kengo Matsumoto, Bernd Sturmfels, David Burns and Henning Krause.

In The Last Decade

Documenta Mathematica

775 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Documenta Mathematica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Documenta Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Documenta Mathematica.

Countries where authors publish in Documenta Mathematica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Documenta Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Documenta Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Documenta Mathematica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026