Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Thompson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Thompson. The network helps show where Fred Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Thompson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Thompson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Thompson. Fred Thompson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thompson, Fred, et al.. (2008). The Information Revolution and the New Public Management. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
6.
Thompson, Fred & L. R. Jones. (2008). Reaping the Advantages of Information and Modern Technology: Moving From Bureaucracy to Hyperarchy and Netcentricity. Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School). 9(1). 148–193.3 indexed citations
7.
Thompson, Fred, et al.. (2008). Budget Makers as Agents: A Preliminary Investigation of Discretionary Behavior Under State-Contingent Rewards. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
8.
Thompson, Fred. (2008). Management Control and the Pentagon: The Strategy-Structure Mismatch. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Thompson, Fred. (2008). Las tres caras de la gestión pública. Gestión y Política Pública. 17(2). 487–509.1 indexed citations
10.
Thompson, Fred. (2008). The Three Faces of Public Management. 9(1). 1–17.2 indexed citations
11.
Thompson, Fred. (2008). Managing Coprovision: Using Expectancy Theory to Overcome the Free-Rider Problem. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
12.
Stanbury, W. T. & Fred Thompson. (2008). Toward a Political Economy of Government Waste. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Thompson, Fred, et al.. (2007). Betting on the Future with a Cloudy Crystal Ball? Revenue Forecasting, Financial Theory, and Budgets— An Expanded Treatment. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Kelman, Steven, Fred Thompson, L. R. Jones, & Kuno Schedler. (2003). Symposium: Dialogue on Definition and Evolution of the Field of Public Management. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 4(2). 1–19.39 indexed citations
16.
Jones, L. R., Fred Thompson, & William Zumeta. (2001). Public Management for the New Millennium: Developing Relevant and Integrated Professional Curricula. Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School). 2(2). 19–38.7 indexed citations
Thompson, Fred. (1982). Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association, vol 18. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 75(7). 573–574.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.