Fred E. Shapiro

777 total citations
54 papers, 505 citations indexed

About

Fred E. Shapiro is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Fred E. Shapiro has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 505 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 18 papers in Surgery and 17 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Fred E. Shapiro's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (28 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (15 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (12 papers). Fred E. Shapiro is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (28 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (15 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (12 papers). Fred E. Shapiro collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Colombia. Fred E. Shapiro's co-authors include Richard D. Urman, Amir H. Taghinia, Sumner A. Slavin, Melvin J. Glimcher, Laurie H. Glimcher, I. Clauss, Ellen M. Gravallese, Jama M. Darling, Steven Young and Rebecca S. Twersky and has published in prestigious journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Fred E. Shapiro

47 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Fred E. Shapiro United States	13	226	182	154	76	53	54	505
Teresa S. Jones United States	9	146 0.6×	45 0.2×	68 0.4×	9 0.1×	2 0.0×	25	391
M. Stokes United Kingdom	11	70 0.3×	30 0.2×	71 0.5×	49 0.6×	5 0.1×	26	264
Markus Trochsler Australia	12	267 1.2×	52 0.3×	30 0.2×	11 0.1×	5 0.1×	64	421
G. Campbell United Kingdom	7	98 0.4×	72 0.4×	27 0.2×	47 0.6×	3 0.1×	11	455
Andrew Webb United Kingdom	11	101 0.4×	54 0.3×	15 0.1×	25 0.3×	32 0.6×	29	418
Aravind Krishnan United States	10	150 0.7×	88 0.5×	13 0.1×	4 0.1×	4 0.1×	39	362
Geoffrey R. Keyes United States	8	353 1.6×	66 0.4×	28 0.2×	27 0.4×	2 0.0×	24	429
Julia Sobol United States	9	159 0.7×	109 0.6×	37 0.2×	14 0.2×		14	328
Cristine S. Velazco United States	13	265 1.2×	24 0.1×	16 0.1×	8 0.1×	4 0.1×	33	435
Şevket Özkaya Türkiye	12	86 0.4×	44 0.2×	27 0.2×	11 0.1×	12 0.2×	58	480

Countries citing papers authored by Fred E. Shapiro

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred E. Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred E. Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred E. Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred E. Shapiro

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred E. Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred E. Shapiro. The network helps show where Fred E. Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred E. Shapiro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred E. Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred E. Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fred E. Shapiro. Fred E. Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Shapiro, Fred E., et al.. (2025). Office-Based Anesthesia: An Update on Current Trends and Practice. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 141(2). 231–235.

Urman, Richard D., et al.. (2025). Creating a Framework for Minimizing Opioid Consumption after Office Based Surgery. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 29(1). 59–59.

Shapiro, Fred E., et al.. (2024). Driving Forces for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Narrative Review. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 28(10). 971–983. 5 indexed citations

Shapiro, Fred E. & Richard D. Urman. (2023). The paradigm of 6 P's: Defining the essence of a safe clinical office-based practice. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 90. 111239–111239. 3 indexed citations

Young, Steven, et al.. (2023). Office-based anesthesia: a contemporary update on outcomes, incentives, and controversies. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 36(6). 643–648. 3 indexed citations

Young, Steven, et al.. (2020). Patients, procedures, and PPE: Safe office-based anesthesia recommendations in the COVID-19 era. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 35(3). 415–424. 3 indexed citations

Shapiro, Fred E., et al.. (2019). Office-Based Anesthesia. Anesthesiology Clinics. 37(2). 317–331. 9 indexed citations

Young, Steven, Fred E. Shapiro, Richard D. Urman, & Alexander A. Hannenberg. (2018). Customizing an Emergency Manual for an Office-Based Setting. ASA Monitor. 82(2). 10–13. 1 indexed citations

Young, Steven, Fred E. Shapiro, & Richard D. Urman. (2018). Office-based surgery and patient outcomes. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 31(6). 707–712. 10 indexed citations

10.

Urman, Richard D., et al.. (2018). Concepts for the Development of Anesthesia-Related Patient Decision Aids. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 128(5). 1030–1035. 13 indexed citations

11.

Domino, Karen B., et al.. (2017). Improving Patient-centered Care Delivery in 2017: Introducing Pre-Anesthesia Decision Aids. ASA Monitor. 81(5). 10–13. 4 indexed citations

12.

Simmons, Jeff & Fred E. Shapiro. (2016). Crisis in Remote Areas Is Not a Remote Problem: In-situ Crisis Management Training for Procedures Outside the O.R. ASA Monitor. 80(5). 16–18. 1 indexed citations

13.

Mellin‐Olsen, Jannicke, Daniela Filipescu, Ravi Mahajan, & Fred E. Shapiro. (2016). Helsinki Declaration 2016: Global Patient Safety. ASA Monitor. 80(5). 22–24. 3 indexed citations

14.

Shapiro, Fred E., et al.. (2014). Safe Anesthesia in the Office-Based Surgical Setting. 78(9). 14–17. 2 indexed citations

15.

Shapiro, Fred E., et al.. (2014). Office-Based Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 119(2). 276–285. 42 indexed citations

16.

Shapiro, Fred E., Lucinda L. Everett, & Richard D. Urman. (2013). Quality Management in Outpatient Surgical Care. International Anesthesiology Clinics. 52(1). 97–108. 5 indexed citations

17.

Shapiro, Fred E., et al.. (2013). The Evolution of Checklists and Implications for Anesthesiology. International Anesthesiology Clinics. 51(4). 53–64. 2 indexed citations

18.

Urman, Richard D., et al.. (2012). Patient safety and office-based anesthesia. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 25(6). 648–653. 24 indexed citations

19.

Taghinia, Amir H., Fred E. Shapiro, & Sumner A. Slavin. (2008). Dexmedetomidine in Aesthetic Facial Surgery: Improving Anesthetic Safety and Efficacy. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 121(1). 269–276. 48 indexed citations

20.

Subramaniam, Kathirvel, et al.. (2005). Patients With Positive Preoperative Stress Tests Undergoing Vascular Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 19(4). 494–498. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact