Franziska Ritschel
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 29
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 8
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 5
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 8
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 5
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 10%
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 5
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 4
-
- Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity 2
- Co-authors
- Stefan EhrlichJoseph A. KingDaniel GeislerVeit RoessnerMaria SeidelIlka BoehmFabio BernardoniMichael N. Smolka
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Franziska Ritschel
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Clinical Psychology 875
- Applied Psychology 152
- Cognitive Neuroscience 356
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 189
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 94
Countries citing papers authored by Franziska Ritschel
This map shows the geographic impact of Franziska Ritschel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Franziska Ritschel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franziska Ritschel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Franziska Ritschel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Franziska Ritschel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Franziska Ritschel. The network helps show where Franziska Ritschel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Franziska Ritschel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 127 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 29 |
About Franziska Ritschel
Franziska Ritschel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (29 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers) and Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (875 citations), Applied Psychology (152 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (356 citations). Franziska Ritschel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Ehrlich, Joseph A. King, Daniel Geisler, Veit Roessner, Maria Seidel, Ilka Boehm, Fabio Bernardoni, Michael N. Smolka, Michael Marxen and Thomas Goschke. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.