Tanja Endraß
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Norbert KathmannAnja RieselMarkus UllspergerJulia KlawohnChristian KaufmannAdrian G. FischerBenedikt ReuterRoland Nigbur
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (62 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (39 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (30 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tanja Endraß
83 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.7k
- Clinical Psychology 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 547
- Social Psychology 337
Countries citing papers authored by Tanja Endraß
This map shows the geographic impact of Tanja Endraß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanja Endraß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanja Endraß more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tanja Endraß
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanja Endraß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanja Endraß. The network helps show where Tanja Endraß may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tanja Endraß
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tanja Endraß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tanja Endraß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tanja Endraß. Tanja Endraß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 237 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Tanja Endraß
Tanja Endraß is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 92 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (62 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (39 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.7k citations) and General Decision Sciences (206 citations). Tanja Endraß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Norbert Kathmann, Anja Riesel, Markus Ullsperger, Julia Klawohn, Christian Kaufmann, Adrian G. Fischer, Benedikt Reuter, Roland Nigbur, Anna Weinberg and Greg Hajcak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.