Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Frans A. van Vught
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frans A. van Vught's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frans A. van Vught with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frans A. van Vught more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frans A. van Vught
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frans A. van Vught. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frans A. van Vught. The network helps show where Frans A. van Vught may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frans A. van Vught
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frans A. van Vught.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frans A. van Vught based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frans A. van Vught. Frans A. van Vught is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dill, David D. & Frans A. van Vught. (2010). National innovation and the academic research enterprise : public policy in global perspective. University of Twente Research Information.47 indexed citations
2.
Dill, David D. & Frans A. van Vught. (2010). National Innovation Policies : Governments as innovation agents of higher education and research. University of Twente Research Information. 6. 107–124.1 indexed citations
3.
Vught, Frans A. van, et al.. (2009). Mapping the Higher Education Landscape. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).76 indexed citations
4.
Vught, Frans A. van, et al.. (2008). Mapping Diversity. Developing a European Classification of Higher Education Insitutions. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Kickert, Walter & Frans A. van Vught. (1995). Public policy and administration sciences in The Netherlands. University of Twente Research Information.18 indexed citations
Neave, Guy & Frans A. van Vught. (1994). Government and higher education in developing nations : a conceptual framework. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–19.29 indexed citations
11.
Neave, Guy & Frans A. van Vught. (1994). Government and Higher Education Relationships Across Three Continents: The Winds of Change. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).89 indexed citations
12.
Vught, Frans A. van & Donald F. Westerheijden. (1993). Quality management and quality assurance in European higher education : Methods and mechanisms. University of Twente Research Information. 1.86 indexed citations
Maassen, Peter & Frans A. van Vught. (1989). Dutch higher education in transition : policy-issues in higher education in the Netherlands. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.