Frank van Hees

654 total citations
15 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Frank van Hees is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Frank van Hees has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Oncology, 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 4 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Frank van Hees's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (12 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (4 papers). Frank van Hees is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (12 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (4 papers). Frank van Hees collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frank van Hees's co-authors include Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Ann G. Zauber, Reinier G.S. Meester, Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Harry J. de Koning, J. Dik F. Habbema, Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Sandeep Vijan, Sameer D. Saini and Corine Penning and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Annals of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Frank van Hees

14 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Frank van Hees
E MacRae United Kingdom
S. Lucas Goede Netherlands
Claudia L. Seguin United States
Dayna R. Cenin Australia
Thomas Riley United States
Claire Cook United Kingdom
Frank van Hees
Citations per year, relative to Frank van Hees Frank van Hees (= 1×) peers Miriam P. van der Meulen

Countries citing papers authored by Frank van Hees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank van Hees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank van Hees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank van Hees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank van Hees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank van Hees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank van Hees. The network helps show where Frank van Hees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank van Hees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank van Hees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank van Hees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank van Hees. Frank van Hees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
2.
Saini, Sameer D., Carmen L. Lewis, Eve A. Kerr, et al.. (2023). Personalized Multilevel Intervention for Improving Appropriate Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults. JAMA Internal Medicine. 183(12). 1334–1334.
4.
Aguiar‐Ibáñez, Raquel, Frank van Hees, Dawn Lee, et al.. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer in the United States. Journal of Medical Economics. 25(1). 469–480. 17 indexed citations
5.
Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris, Frank van Hees, Ernst J. Kuipers, et al.. (2016). Developing a score chart to improve risk stratification of patients with colorectal adenoma. Endoscopy. 48(6). 563–570. 8 indexed citations
6.
Rosmalen, Joost van, Sonja Kroep, Frank van Hees, et al.. (2016). Calibrating Parameters for Microsimulation Disease Models. Medical Decision Making. 36(5). 652–665. 9 indexed citations
7.
Hees, Frank van, Ann G. Zauber, Marie‐Louise A. Heijnen, et al.. (2015). The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening: the case of the Netherlands. Gut. 64(12). 1985–1997. 57 indexed citations
8.
Hees, Frank van, Sameer D. Saini, Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, et al.. (2015). Personalizing Colonoscopy Screening for Elderly Individuals Based on Screening History, Cancer Risk, and Comorbidity Status Could Increase Cost Effectiveness. Gastroenterology. 149(6). 1425–1437. 62 indexed citations
9.
Goede, S. Lucas, Linda Rabeneck, Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, et al.. (2015). The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs. International Journal of Cancer. 137(5). 1119–1127. 8 indexed citations
10.
Hees, Frank van, J. Dik F. Habbema, Reinier G.S. Meester, et al.. (2014). Should Colorectal Cancer Screening Be Considered in Elderly Persons Without Previous Screening. Annals of Internal Medicine. 4 indexed citations
11.
Hees, Frank van, J. Dik F. Habbema, Reinier G.S. Meester, et al.. (2014). Should Colorectal Cancer Screening Be Considered in Elderly Persons Without Previous Screening?. Annals of Internal Medicine. 160(11). 750–759. 91 indexed citations
12.
Saini, Sameer D., Frank van Hees, & Sandeep Vijan. (2014). Smarter Screening for Cancer. JAMA. 312(21). 2211–2211. 21 indexed citations
13.
Knudsen, Amy B., Frank van Hees, Franklin G. Berger, et al.. (2014). Optimal Colorectal Cancer Screening in States' Low-Income, Uninsured Populations-The Case of South Carolina. Health Services Research. 50(3). 768–789. 14 indexed citations
14.
Hees, Frank van, et al.. (2014). The Appropriateness of More Intensive Colonoscopy Screening Than Recommended in Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Internal Medicine. 174(10). 1568–1568. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026