Amy B. Knudsen

5.4k total citations · 3 hit papers
75 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Amy B. Knudsen is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy B. Knudsen has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Oncology, 24 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 19 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Amy B. Knudsen's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (50 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (22 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (19 papers). Amy B. Knudsen is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (50 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (22 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (19 papers). Amy B. Knudsen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Amy B. Knudsen's co-authors include Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Karen M. Kuntz, Ann G. Zauber, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Carolyn M. Rutter, Hermann Brenner, Janneke Wilschut, Eric J. Feuer, V. Paul Doria‐Rose and Chester Pabiniak and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Annals of Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Amy B. Knudsen

72 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal C... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 2019 2021 100 200 300

Peers

Amy B. Knudsen
David Pee United States
Jan Stjernswärd Switzerland
Nora B. Henrikson United States
Polly Feigl United States
Eric Tai United States
Ana P. Ortíz Puerto Rico
Donna Buono United States
David Pee United States
Amy B. Knudsen
Citations per year, relative to Amy B. Knudsen Amy B. Knudsen (= 1×) peers David Pee

Countries citing papers authored by Amy B. Knudsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy B. Knudsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy B. Knudsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy B. Knudsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy B. Knudsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy B. Knudsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy B. Knudsen. The network helps show where Amy B. Knudsen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy B. Knudsen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy B. Knudsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy B. Knudsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy B. Knudsen. Amy B. Knudsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Knudsen, Amy B., Daan Nieboer, Karen M. Kuntz, et al.. (2025). Benefits of colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical testing with varying positivity thresholds by age and sex. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 117(11). 2219–2228.
3.
Lima, Pedro Nascimento de, Amy B. Knudsen, Nicholson Collier, et al.. (2024). 908 CHARACTERISTICS OF A COST-EFFECTIVE BLOOD TEST FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. Gastroenterology. 166(5). S–219. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lima, Pedro Nascimento de, Amy B. Knudsen, Karen M. Kuntz, et al.. (2024). Characteristics of a cost-effective blood test for colorectal cancer screening. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 116(10). 1612–1620. 10 indexed citations
5.
Knudsen, Amy B., Amy Trentham‐Dietz, Jane J. Kim, et al.. (2023). Estimated US Cancer Deaths Prevented With Increased Use of Lung, Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Network Open. 6(11). e2344698–e2344698. 24 indexed citations
6.
Peters, Mary Linton B., et al.. (2023). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Pancreatic Cancer Among High-Risk Populations. JCO Oncology Practice. 20(2). 278–290. 9 indexed citations
7.
Chhatwal, Jagpreet, Peter P. Mueller, Qiushi Chen, et al.. (2023). Estimated Reductions in Opioid Overdose Deaths With Sustainment of Public Health Interventions in 4 US States. JAMA Network Open. 6(6). e2314925–e2314925. 19 indexed citations
8.
Alarid‐Escudero, Fernando, Amy B. Knudsen, Jonathan Ozik, Nicholson Collier, & Karen M. Kuntz. (2022). Characterization and Valuation of the Uncertainty of Calibrated Parameters in Microsimulation Decision Models. Frontiers in Physiology. 13. 780917–780917. 2 indexed citations
9.
Peterse, Elisabeth F.P., Reinier G.S. Meester, Lucie de Jonge, et al.. (2020). Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 113(2). 154–161. 65 indexed citations
10.
Rutter, Carolyn M., Amy B. Knudsen, Jennifer S Lin, & Kathryn Bouskill. (2020). Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 30(1). 3–12. 44 indexed citations
11.
Seguin, Claudia L., Anna P. Lietz, Jason D. Wright, et al.. (2020). Surveillance in Older Women With Incidental Ovarian Cysts: Maximal Projected Benefits by Age and Comorbidity Level. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 18(1). 10–18. 1 indexed citations
12.
Weaver, Davis T., Alexander Melamed, J. Alejandro Rauh‐Hain, et al.. (2018). Modeling treatment outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Projected benefits of a test to optimize treatment selection. Gynecologic Oncology. 149(2). 256–262. 6 indexed citations
13.
Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris, Karen M. Kuntz, Amy B. Knudsen, et al.. (2012). Contribution of Screening and Survival Differences to Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Rates. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 21(5). 728–736. 167 indexed citations
14.
Haug, Ulrike, Amy B. Knudsen, & Karen M. Kuntz. (2012). How should individuals with a false‐positive fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer be managed? A decision analysis. International Journal of Cancer. 131(9). 2094–2102. 6 indexed citations
15.
Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Iris, Karen M. Kuntz, Amy B. Knudsen, et al.. (2010). Stool DNA Testing to Screen for Colorectal Cancer in the Medicare Population. Annals of Internal Medicine. 153(6). 1 indexed citations
16.
Knudsen, Amy B., et al.. (1992). Problèmes dus aux maladies à transmission vectorielle et urbanisation accélérée: nouvelles approches de la lutte antivectorielle. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 70(2). 165–171. 1 indexed citations
17.
Knudsen, Amy B., et al.. (1980). Aerial application of 50% malathion for the control of sylvatic vectors of yellow fever in a rural wooded community near Enugu, Nigeria.. Mosquito news. 40(4). 551–559. 1 indexed citations
18.
Knudsen, Amy B., et al.. (1980). Ground application of malathion thermal fogs and cold mists for the control of sylvatic vectors of yellow fever in rural communities near Enugu, Nigeria.. Mosquito news. 40(4). 541–550. 1 indexed citations
19.
Knudsen, Amy B.. (1977). The silent jungle transmission cycle of dengue virus and its tenable relationship to endemic dengue in Malaysia.. 31(1). 41–47. 11 indexed citations
20.
Knudsen, Amy B., et al.. (1968). Methods used in Utah for sampling tabanid populations.. Mosquito news. 28(3). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026