Francesco Ciampi

2.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
54 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Francesco Ciampi is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Francesco Ciampi has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Accounting, 18 papers in Strategy and Management and 18 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Francesco Ciampi's work include Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction (21 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (10 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers). Francesco Ciampi is often cited by papers focused on Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction (21 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (10 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers). Francesco Ciampi collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Russia. Francesco Ciampi's co-authors include Giacomo Marzi, N Gordini, Alessandro Magrini, Armando Papa, Alberto Ferraris, Beatrice Orlando, Stefano Bresciani, Monica Faraoni, Bernardo Bertoldi and Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Energy and Journal of Business Research.

In The Last Decade

Francesco Ciampi

53 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities o... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 2021 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Francesco Ciampi Italy 19 793 527 520 380 312 54 2.0k
Anne‐Laure Mention Finland 21 1.0k 1.3× 368 0.7× 256 0.5× 414 1.1× 303 1.0× 89 2.1k
Luca Dezi Italy 18 1.2k 1.5× 318 0.6× 186 0.4× 343 0.9× 508 1.6× 34 2.2k
Robyn L. Raschke United States 26 682 0.9× 478 0.9× 380 0.7× 220 0.6× 147 0.5× 52 2.0k
Maximilian Palmié Switzerland 20 844 1.1× 333 0.6× 163 0.3× 289 0.8× 344 1.1× 38 1.7k
Anna Nosella Italy 26 1.3k 1.7× 241 0.5× 209 0.4× 422 1.1× 654 2.1× 71 2.2k
Gautam Ray United States 17 1.4k 1.7× 813 1.5× 178 0.3× 253 0.7× 245 0.8× 37 2.4k
Waleed A. Muhanna United States 18 1.3k 1.6× 902 1.7× 203 0.4× 221 0.6× 254 0.8× 33 2.5k
Vahid Jafari‐Sadeghi United Kingdom 29 1.1k 1.3× 237 0.4× 182 0.3× 451 1.2× 728 2.3× 82 2.3k
Gianluca Elia Italy 22 631 0.8× 330 0.6× 128 0.2× 274 0.7× 583 1.9× 75 1.9k
Nicolai Etienne Fabian Netherlands 5 1.0k 1.3× 474 0.9× 177 0.3× 653 1.7× 511 1.6× 8 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Ciampi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Ciampi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Ciampi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Ciampi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Ciampi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Ciampi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Ciampi. The network helps show where Francesco Ciampi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Ciampi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Ciampi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Ciampi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Ciampi. Francesco Ciampi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Qingyu, et al.. (2023). What Motivates Bitcoin Miners to Practice Bitcoin Mining: An Assessment Based on Behavioral Reasoning Theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 71. 8209–8222. 7 indexed citations
2.
Bresciani, Stefano, et al.. (2021). Using big data for co-innovation processes: Mapping the field of data-driven innovation, proposing theoretical developments and providing a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management. 60. 102347–102347. 186 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Ciampi, Francesco, et al.. (2021). Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives. Scientometrics. 126(3). 2141–2188. 88 indexed citations
4.
Ciampi, Francesco, et al.. (2021). The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 176. 121383–121383. 89 indexed citations
5.
Annosi, María Carmela, Giacomo Marzi, Francesco Ciampi, & Riccardo Rialti. (2020). An Ambidextrous Approach to Practice-Based Innovation for Social Product Development: Lessons From A Dutch Company. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 69(2). 376–387. 19 indexed citations
6.
Ferraris, Alberto, Chiara Giachino, Francesco Ciampi, & Jérôme Couturier. (2019). R&D internationalization in medium-sized firms: The moderating role of knowledge management in enhancing innovation performances. Journal of Business Research. 128. 711–718. 75 indexed citations
7.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2018). Using Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Characteristics for Small Enterprise Default Prediction. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS. 15. 16 indexed citations
8.
Ciampi, Francesco, Giacomo Marzi, & Riccardo Rialti. (2018). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, BIG DATA, STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY, AGILITY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK BASED ON EXISTING LITERATURE. Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln). 51–58. 10 indexed citations
9.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2018). Come la consulenza direzionale crea conoscenza. Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation). 1 indexed citations
10.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2017). The Potential of Top Management Characteristics for Small Enterprise Default Prediction Modelling. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS. 14. 397–408. 7 indexed citations
11.
12.
Ciampi, Francesco, et al.. (2009). Are Credit Scoring Models Able To Predict Small Enterprise Default? Statistical Evidence from Italian Small Enterprises. BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca). 8(1). 3–18. 13 indexed citations
13.
Ciampi, Francesco, et al.. (2009). Using Artificial Neural Networks Analysis for Small Enterprise Default Prediction Modeling: Statistical Evidence from Italian Firms. 10 indexed citations
14.
Ciampi, Francesco, et al.. (2009). Are Credit Scoring Models Able to Predict Small Enterprise Default? Statistical Evidence from Italian Small Enterprises. 9 indexed citations
15.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2008). Defining Management Consulting and Exploring Its Knowledge Creation Potential. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5(1). 5 indexed citations
16.
Ciampi, Francesco & Atul Gupta. (2008). Proceedings of the 8th Global Conference on Business & Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
17.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2007). Management Consulting and Knowledge Creation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 53–69. 3 indexed citations
18.
Brondoni, Silvio M., et al.. (2007). Ouverture de 'Management Consulting and Global Markets' *. INFM-OAR (INFN Catania). 1 indexed citations
19.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2007). Knowledge Creation through Management Consulting. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
20.
Ciampi, Francesco. (2004). Fondamenti di economia e gestione delle imprese. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026