Francesca Minerva
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 6
- Co-authors
- Alberto GiubiliniJulian SavulescuPeter SingerUdo SchüklenkAnders SandbergAndrew MasonDiana S. FleischmanWalter Veit
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Ethics (6 papers)Bioethics (4 papers)Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (2 papers)The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (1 paper)Political Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Francesca Minerva
27 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Health Informatics 15
- Applied Psychology 46
- Reproductive Medicine 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 149
- General Health Professions 125
Countries citing papers authored by Francesca Minerva
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca Minerva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca Minerva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca Minerva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca Minerva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca Minerva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca Minerva. The network helps show where Francesca Minerva may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Francesca Minerva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 66 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 112 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 6 |
About Francesca Minerva
Francesca Minerva is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Reproductive Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacy and Transplantation, having authored 28 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (15 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations), Reproductive Medicine (63 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (149 citations) and General Health Professions (125 citations). Francesca Minerva has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Alberto Giubilini, Julian Savulescu, Peter Singer, Udo Schüklenk, Anders Sandberg, Andrew Mason, Diana S. Fleischman, Walter Veit, Jonathan Anomaly and Nicholas Agar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Bioethics, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine and Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.