Daniela Cutas
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 19
-
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare 7
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 3
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 4
- Organ Donation and Transplantation 2
-
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 5
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 4
-
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 3
- Co-authors
- Anna SmajdorChristian MuntheLars SandmanSarah ChanDavid ShawKristien HensGuido de WertWybo Dondorp
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniela Cutas
25 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Reproductive Medicine 124
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 69
- Gender Studies 31
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 92
- General Health Professions 68
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Cutas
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Cutas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Cutas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Cutas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Cutas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Cutas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Cutas. The network helps show where Daniela Cutas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Cutas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 7 | [BACKGROUND PAPER] Artificial Gametes | 2016 | 2 |
| 8 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 78 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 4 |
About Daniela Cutas
Daniela Cutas is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Demography, having authored 29 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (19 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (124 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (69 citations), Gender Studies (31 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (92 citations) and General Health Professions (68 citations). Daniela Cutas has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Anna Smajdor, Christian Munthe, Lars Sandman, Sarah Chan, David Shaw, Kristien Hens, Guido de Wert, Wybo Dondorp, Tsjalling Swierstra and Sjoerd Repping. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Health Care Analysis, Bioethics, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy and Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.