Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Missing in Action: Teacher and Health Worker Absence in Developing Countries
2006788 citationsNazmul Chaudhury, Jeffrey S. Hammer et al.The Journal of Economic Perspectivesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Frances Rogers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frances Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances Rogers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances Rogers. The network helps show where Frances Rogers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frances Rogers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frances Rogers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frances Rogers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frances Rogers. Frances Rogers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rogers, Frances & Shwetlena Sabarwal. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic : Shocks to Education and Policy Responses. 1–56.138 indexed citations
2.
Azevedo, João Pedro, et al.. (2019). Ending Learning Poverty : What Will It Take?. 1–50.37 indexed citations
3.
Huang, Zhan, Oliver Kilian, Jee-Hyub Kim, et al.. (2017). Europe PMC in 2017. Nucleic Acids Research. 46(D1). D1254–D1260.25 indexed citations
4.
Rogers, Frances, et al.. (2016). Ninis en América Latina : 20 millones de jóvenes en busca de oportunidades. 1–73.5 indexed citations
Dang, Hai‐Anh & Frances Rogers. (2008). The Growing Phenomenon of Private Tutoring: Does it Deepen Human Capital, Widen Inequalities, or Waste Resources?. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Stern, Nicholas, Jean-Jacques Dethier, & Frances Rogers. (2006). Growth and Empowerment: Making Development Happen. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1.10 indexed citations
Chaudhury, Nazmul, Jeffrey S. Hammer, Michael Kremer, Karthik Muralidharan, & Frances Rogers. (2006). Missing in Action: Teacher and Health Worker Absence in Developing Countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 20(1). 91–116.788 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Stern, Nicholas, Frances Rogers, & Jean-Jacques Dethier. (2005). Growth and Empowerment. The MIT Press eBooks.29 indexed citations
18.
Chaudhury, Nazmul, Jeffrey S. Hammer, Michael Kremer, Karthik Muralidharan, & Frances Rogers. (2004). Provider absence in schools and health clinics.9 indexed citations
19.
Chaudhury, Nazmul, Jeffrey S. Hammer, Karthik Muralidharan, Michael Kremer, & Frances Rogers. (2004). Teacher and Health Care Provider Absence: A Multi-Country Study.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.