Forrest R. Pitts
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Transportation top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Richard L. MorrillDuane F. MarbleG. A. FullerRonald AblerJohn S. AdamsPeter GouldRobert J. SmithPerry Hanson
- Topics
- Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers)Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers)Urban and spatial planning (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Forrest R. Pitts
14 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Economics and Econometrics 65
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 63
- Transportation 46
- Global and Planetary Change 35
Countries citing papers authored by Forrest R. Pitts
This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest R. Pitts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest R. Pitts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest R. Pitts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest R. Pitts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest R. Pitts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest R. Pitts. The network helps show where Forrest R. Pitts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Forrest R. Pitts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Forrest R. Pitts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Forrest R. Pitts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Forrest R. Pitts. Forrest R. Pitts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 48 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | Two Japanese villages: Matsunagi, a Japanese mountain community , Kurusu, a Japanese agricultural community | 1 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 106 | |
| 9 | HAGER III AND HAGER IV: TWO MONTE CARLO COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR THE STUDY OF SPATIAL DIFFUSION PROBLEMS. | 4 |
| 10 | Introduction to human geography | 7 |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Forrest R. Pitts
Forrest R. Pitts is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers) and Urban and spatial planning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (46 citations), Archeology (7 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (63 citations). Forrest R. Pitts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Morrill, Duane F. Marble, G. A. Fuller, Ronald Abler, John S. Adams, Peter Gould, Robert J. Smith and Perry Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Social Networks, Geographical Review and The Professional Geographer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.