Robert J. Smith
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Diogo VeríssimoMatthew J. WalpoleNigel Leader‐WilliamsDouglas C. MacMillanHugh P. PossinghamNoah SitatiAndrew BalmfordAndrew T. Knight
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (31 papers)Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (25 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Robert J. Smith
104 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Ecology 2.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.7k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 994
- Ecological Modeling 967
- Social Psychology 770
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Smith. The network helps show where Robert J. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Smith. Robert J. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | Comparison of reproductive success of in-situ burial versus the use of abandoned burrows for carcass interment by Nicrophorus investigator (Coleoptera: Silphidae). | 11 |
| 20 | Resolving the Tragedy of the Commons by Creating Private Property Rights in Wildlife | 113 |
About Robert J. Smith
Robert J. Smith is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 108 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (31 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (25 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (967 citations), Ecology (2.1k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (994 citations). Robert J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Diogo Veríssimo, Matthew J. Walpole, Nigel Leader‐Williams, Douglas C. MacMillan, Hugh P. Possingham, Noah Sitati, Andrew Balmford, Andrew T. Knight, Matthew Linkie and Josie Carwardine. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.