F.J. Arcelus

99 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

F.J. Arcelus
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Management Information Systems 931
  • Strategy and Management 917
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 435
  • Marketing 376
  • Management Science and Operations Research 458
Replace Roger W. Schmenner with:
Roger W. Schmenner United States
Ari‐Pekka Hameri Switzerland
Ronan McIvor United Kingdom
Robert H. Hayes United States
Emilio Esposito Italy
Mike Hobday United Kingdom
Matteo Giacomo Maria Kalchschmidt Italy
Patrizia Garengo Italy
Donald J. Bowersox United States
Bin Jiang United States
F.J. Arcelus relative to Roger W. Schmenner United States Roger W. Schmenner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roger W. Schmenner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.J. Arcelus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.J. Arcelus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.J. Arcelus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.J. Arcelus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.J. Arcelus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.J. Arcelus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.J. Arcelus. The network helps show where F.J. Arcelus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside F.J. Arcelus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.J. Arcelus Line = papers co-authored together F.J. Arcelus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010250
2 1975169
3 2003121
4 200296
5 198493
6 198784
7 200565
8 199559
9 200155
10 199752
11 200552
12 199950
13 199346
14 200045
15 199145
16 199945
17 201143
18 200641
19 200839
20 198539

About F.J. Arcelus

F.J. Arcelus is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (49 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (26 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (14 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (9 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (7 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (7 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (931 citations), Strategy and Management (917 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (435 citations), Marketing (376 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (458 citations). F.J. Arcelus has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Spain and India. Frequent co-authors include G. Srinivasan, Allan H. Meltzer, Wojciech Nasierowski, Javier Faulín, Pablo Arocena, Nita H. Shah, Pradeep Banerjee, Timo Pakkala, A.H.M.A. Rahim and S.K. Goyal. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Production Economics, European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of the Operational Research Society, International Transactions in Operational Research and Journal of money credit and banking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact