Field M. Watts

837 total citations
27 papers, 577 citations indexed

About

Field M. Watts is a scholar working on Education, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Field M. Watts has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 577 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 12 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Field M. Watts's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (14 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (12 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers). Field M. Watts is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (14 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (12 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (9 papers). Field M. Watts collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Field M. Watts's co-authors include Ginger V. Shultz, Amber J. Dood, Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez, Anne Ruggles Gere, Richard A. Bunce, Nicole Graulich, Baskar Nammalwar, Barry C. Thompson and Doris M. Benbrook and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Tetrahedron and European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Field M. Watts

27 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Field M. Watts

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Field M. Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Field M. Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Field M. Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Field M. Watts

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Field M. Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Field M. Watts. The network helps show where Field M. Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Field M. Watts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Field M. Watts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Field M. Watts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Field M. Watts. Field M. Watts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	A review of research on the teaching and learning of quantum mechanics 2025 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·(unknown), Field M. Watts, Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez	1
2	Self-Reported Limitations in Chemistry Education Research: Providing Specific and Contextualized Limitations Supports Researchers and Practitioners 2024 ·Journal of Chemical Education ·Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez, Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Field M. Watts, (unknown)	3
3	“That's not a super important point”: second-semester organic chemistry students’ lines of reasoning when comparing substitution reactions 2024 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·(unknown), Field M. Watts, (unknown), Nicole Graulich, Ginger V. Shultz	2
4	Analysis of organic chemistry students’ developing reasoning elicited by a scaffolded case comparison activity 2024 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·(unknown), Field M. Watts, Amber J. Dood, Ginger V. Shultz	9
5	Automated Text Analysis of Organic Chemistry Students’ Written Hypotheses 2024 ·Journal of Chemical Education ·Amber J. Dood, Field M. Watts, (unknown), Ginger V. Shultz	7
6	Examining the role of assignment design and peer review on student responses and revisions to an organic chemistry writing-to-learn assignment 2024 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·Field M. Watts, Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Ginger V. Shultz	2
7	Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer review and revision in writing-to-learn 2024 ·Assessing Writing ·Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Field M. Watts, Ginger V. Shultz	4
8	A Portrait of MWrite as a Research Program: A Review of Research on Writing-to-Learn in STEM through the MWrite Program 2023 ·SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología ·Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Field M. Watts, (unknown), Anne Ruggles Gere	6
9	Comparing Student and Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Organic Chemistry Writing-to-Learn Assignments 2023 ·Journal of Chemical Education ·Field M. Watts, Amber J. Dood, Ginger V. Shultz, Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez	49
10	Automated, content-focused feedback for a writing-to-learn assignment in an undergraduate organic chemistry course 2023 ·Field M. Watts, Amber J. Dood, Ginger V. Shultz	10
11	The use of frameworks in chemistry education research 2023 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez, (unknown), Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Field M. Watts	12
12	Considering alternative reaction mechanisms: students’ use of multiple representations to reason about mechanisms for a writing-to-learn assignment 2022 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·Field M. Watts, (unknown), (unknown), Ginger V. Shultz	23
13	Organic Chemistry Students’ Written Descriptions and Explanations of Resonance and Its Influence on Reactivity 2021 ·Journal of Chemical Education ·(unknown), Field M. Watts, Ginger V. Shultz	29
14	Investigating students’ reasoning over time for case comparisons of acyl transfer reaction mechanisms 2021 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·Field M. Watts, (unknown), (unknown), Nicole Graulich, Ginger V. Shultz	34
15	Students’ meaningful learning experiences from participating in organic chemistry writing-to-learn activities 2021 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·(unknown), Field M. Watts, (unknown), (unknown), Anne Ruggles Gere, Ginger V. Shultz	45
16	The current state of methods for establishing reliability in qualitative chemistry education research articles 2021 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·Field M. Watts, Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn	69
17	What students write about when students write about mechanisms: analysis of features present in students’ written descriptions of an organic reaction mechanism 2020 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·Field M. Watts, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Barry C. Thompson, Anne Ruggles Gere, Ginger V. Shultz	48
18	Writing Assignments to Support the Learning Goals of a CURE 2020 ·Journal of Chemical Education ·Field M. Watts, (unknown), Ginger V. Shultz	18
19	Exploring Student Thinking about Addition Reactions 2020 ·Journal of Chemical Education ·Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Field M. Watts, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Ginger V. Shultz	29
20	Eliciting student thinking about acid–base reactions via app and paper–pencil based problem solving 2020 ·Chemistry Education Research and Practice ·(unknown), Field M. Watts, (unknown), (unknown), Ginger V. Shultz, Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn	34

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact