Fernando Vidal

2.0k citations
70 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Vidal

64 papers receiving 938 citations

Peers

Fernando Vidal
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • General Psychology 46
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 161
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 309
  • History and Philosophy of Science 50
  • Philosophy 103
Replace Frank W. Stahnisch with:
Frank W. Stahnisch Canada
James L. McCartney United States
Charles D. Aring United States
Martin Smith United Kingdom
Tsung-Yi Lin Canada
R. Persaud United Kingdom
Walter Glannon Canada
Marleen Decruyenaere Belgium
John Hartung United States
Philip Thomas United Kingdom
Fernando Vidal relative to Frank W. Stahnisch Canada Frank W. Stahnisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.3×
Frank W. Stahnisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Vidal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Vidal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Vidal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Vidal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Vidal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Vidal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Vidal. The network helps show where Fernando Vidal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Vidal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Vidal Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Vidal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009238
2
Neurocultures : glimpses into an expanding universe
201178
3 201555
4 199655
5 201753
6 200748
7 198046
8 199445
9 199036
10 199633
11 200233
12 198933
13 201131
14 201730
15 199620
16 200719
17 199717
18 199417
19 201815
20 199114

About Fernando Vidal

Fernando Vidal is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (19 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (46 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (161 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (309 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations) and Philosophy (103 citations). Fernando Vidal has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Ortega, Jaume Canet, J. Fernández Llamazares, J. L. Aguilar, Michael V. Ortiz, Dora B. Heras, L. Gallart, Jose Luis Puerta, P. Vila and P. Ortiz. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, Science in Context, History of the Human Sciences, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact