James L. McCartney

132 total papers · 1.1k total citations
47 papers, 739 citations indexed

About

James L. McCartney is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, James L. McCartney has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 739 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in James L. McCartney's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers). James L. McCartney is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers). James L. McCartney collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. James L. McCartney's co-authors include Duncan Lindsey, John F. Galliher, Danny Wedding, Edward Brent, David B. Pillemer, Richard J. Light, Grant Blank, Ronald Andersen, Mark C. Stafford and Jonathan Eaton and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Psychiatry and The Journal of Sex Research.

In The Last Decade

James L. McCartney

39 papers receiving 620 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James L. McCartney 210 119 95 75 48 47 739
Susana Sanduvete‐Chaves 143 0.7× 140 1.2× 53 0.6× 154 2.1× 41 0.9× 39 790
Jordan D. Dworkin 166 0.8× 96 0.8× 88 0.9× 152 2.0× 19 0.4× 42 833
J. Strong 114 0.5× 116 1.0× 56 0.6× 113 1.5× 37 0.8× 34 671
Cynthia McRae 188 0.9× 119 1.0× 69 0.7× 96 1.3× 24 0.5× 24 790
Kevin P. Kaut 166 0.8× 106 0.9× 39 0.4× 81 1.1× 14 0.3× 24 693
Liv Berit Augestad 65 0.3× 198 1.7× 140 1.5× 77 1.0× 74 1.5× 46 895
Simon Schwab 281 1.3× 228 1.9× 35 0.4× 137 1.8× 14 0.3× 41 785
Samantha F. Anderson 154 0.7× 128 1.1× 74 0.8× 153 2.0× 17 0.4× 33 781
John D. Williams 351 1.7× 78 0.7× 36 0.4× 115 1.5× 14 0.3× 73 806
J Lancaster 92 0.4× 49 0.4× 42 0.4× 51 0.7× 152 3.2× 21 697

Countries citing papers authored by James L. McCartney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. McCartney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. McCartney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. McCartney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. McCartney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. McCartney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. McCartney. The network helps show where James L. McCartney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. McCartney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. McCartney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. McCartney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. McCartney. James L. McCartney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026