Fernando Juliani
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Public Administration
- Co-authors
- Otávio José de OliveiraFábio Francisco da SilvaCarlos Dias MacielMauro Hugo MathiasLuís César Ferreira Motta BarbosaJosé Salvador da Motta ReisGilberto Santos
- Topics
- Quality and Supply Management (5 papers)Quality and Management Systems (3 papers)Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Information ManagementProduction Planning & Control
In The Last Decade
Fernando Juliani
10 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Management Information Systems 91
- Strategy and Management 68
- Management Science and Operations Research 30
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 13
- Public Administration 12
Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Juliani
This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Juliani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Juliani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Juliani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Juliani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Juliani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Juliani. The network helps show where Fernando Juliani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fernando Juliani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fernando Juliani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fernando Juliani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fernando Juliani. Fernando Juliani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 3 |
About Fernando Juliani
Fernando Juliani is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 10 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (5 papers), Quality and Management Systems (3 papers) and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (91 citations), Strategy and Management (68 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (6 citations). Fernando Juliani has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Otávio José de Oliveira, Fábio Francisco da Silva, Carlos Dias Maciel, Mauro Hugo Mathias, Luís César Ferreira Motta Barbosa, José Salvador da Motta Reis and Gilberto Santos. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Information Management and Production Planning & Control.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.