Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula

1.3k citations
74 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 18

Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula

68 papers receiving 997 citations

Peers

Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Pharmacology 109
  • Food Science 222
  • Biochemistry 64
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 86
  • Pharmacology 167
Replace Eduardo José Crevelin with:
Eduardo José Crevelin Brazil
Mohamed Haddad France
Marisi G. Soares Brazil
Jianyong Si China
Cid Aimbiré de Moraes Santos Brazil
Marı́a Luisa Villarreal Mexico
Anas Subarnas Indonesia
Oscar Herrera-Calderón Peru
Thi Kim Quy Ha South Korea
Nelson G. M. Gomes Portugal
Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula relative to Eduardo José Crevelin Brazil Eduardo José Crevelin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Eduardo José Crevelin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula. The network helps show where Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20251
3 20246
4 20241
5 20241
6 20241
7 20243
8 20233
9 20230
10 20234
11 20231
12 20221
13 20220
14 20212
15 202015
16 20204
17 20206
18 201916
19 201921
20 201038

About Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula

Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Cancer Research, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (17 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (15 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (12 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (10 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (8 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (109 citations), Food Science (222 citations) and Biochemistry (64 citations). Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fernando B. Da Costa, Rejane Barbosa de Oliveira, Marisi G. Soares, Bruno Alves Rocha, RuAngelie Edrada‐Ebel, Tiago Branquinho Oliveira, Leonardo Gobbo‐Neto, Danielle Ferreira Dias, Ana Paula Campanelli and Thaís Helena Gasparoto. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry & Biodiversity, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Planta Medica, Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia and Phytochemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026