Feng Chang-gen

820 citations
43 papers · 697 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Chang-gen

42 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Feng Chang-gen
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Water Science and Technology 158
  • Analytical Chemistry 98
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 53
  • Inorganic Chemistry 86
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 42
Replace Barry Crittenden with:
Barry Crittenden United Kingdom
R. Natarajan India
Mohammad Reza Dehghani Iran
V. Subramanian India
Vincenzo Tufano Italy
Qihui Hu China
Xinrui Li China
Hongsuk Chung South Korea
Naseem Irfan Pakistan
Shekhar Kumar India
Feng Chang-gen relative to Barry Crittenden United Kingdom Barry Crittenden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Barry Crittenden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Chang-gen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Chang-gen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Chang-gen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Chang-gen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Chang-gen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Chang-gen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Chang-gen. The network helps show where Feng Chang-gen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Chang-gen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Chang-gen Line = papers co-authored together Feng Chang-gen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009132
2 201477
3 201575
4 201965
5 201955
6 202039
7 201434
8 202029
9 201526
10 201824
11 201318
12 201715
13 201313
14 20169
15 19988
16 19968
17 20188
18
Development Research of Exploding Foil Initiator System
20116
19 20156
20 19986

About Feng Chang-gen

Feng Chang-gen is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Computational Mechanics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energetic Materials and Combustion (11 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (9 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (4 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (4 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (4 papers), Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (3 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (3 papers) and Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (158 citations), Analytical Chemistry (98 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (53 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (86 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (42 citations). Feng Chang-gen has collaborated with scholars based in China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Qingxuan Zeng, Mingyu Li, Qiang Gan, Ping Huang, Zhenyi Liu, Xinming Qian, Jing Guo-xun, Min Li, Xiaojing Meng and Jian Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Defence Technology, Applied Surface Science, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Current Organic Chemistry and Applied Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact