Federico G. Gil
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Public Administration
- Demography
- Co-authors
- Claudio VélizHilliard A. GardinerThomas AndersonCarl Q. ChristolHenry A. LandsbergerJack ThomasDavid HealyJoseph S. Tulchin
- Topics
- Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (7 papers)International Relations in Latin America (2 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsPublic AdministrationSociology and Political Science
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Federico G. Gil
18 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Political Science and International Relations 181
- Sociology and Political Science 162
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21
- Public Administration 21
- Demography 17
Countries citing papers authored by Federico G. Gil
This map shows the geographic impact of Federico G. Gil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico G. Gil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico G. Gil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federico G. Gil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico G. Gil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico G. Gil. The network helps show where Federico G. Gil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federico G. Gil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federico G. Gil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federico G. Gil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Federico G. Gil. Federico G. Gil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 128 | |
| 10 | The political system of Chile | 72 |
| 11 | The Chilean presidential election of September 4, 1964 | 6 |
| 12 | Genesis and modernization of political parties in Chile | 3 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2 |
About Federico G. Gil
Federico G. Gil is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (7 papers), International Relations in Latin America (2 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (181 citations), Public Administration (21 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (162 citations). Federico G. Gil has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Claudio Véliz, Hilliard A. Gardiner, Thomas Anderson, Carl Q. Christol, Henry A. Landsberger, Jack Thomas, David Healy, Joseph S. Tulchin, Lester D. Langley and Harry Magdoff. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.